EPA Elects Not to Amend Four Air Toxics Rules

EPA finalized its decision not to amend four air toxics rules (also known as MACT standards) covering eight types of production processes. The agency concluded that the existing MACT (or Maximum Achievable Control Technology) standards effectively address air toxic emissions for all eight industries and that no additional controls are necessary.

Within eight years of setting the MACT standards, Clean Air Act section 112(f) directs EPA to assess the remaining health risks from each source category to determine whether the MACT standards protect public health with an ample margin of safety and protect against adverse environmental effects. This is a "risk-based" approach called residual risk. Here, EPA must determine whether more health-protective standards are necessary.

EPA's recent residual risk assessment found that after application of the MACT standards the chronic cancer risks are below 1-in-1 million, and no further cancer risk reduction is required. The analysis also found that non-cancer and acute risks to humans, as well as ecological risks from these facilities are low and that no further controls are warranted. Also, every eight years after setting the MACT standards, Clean Air Act section 112 (d)(6) requires that EPA review and revise the standards, if necessary, to account for improvements in air pollution controls and/or prevention. The technology assessment did not identify any advancements in practices, processes, or control technology.

The final rule affects the following rules/standards, with their issue dates noted in parentheses, followed by the affected source categories:

  • Group I Polymers and Resins (09/05/96) which includes the following production processes: Polysulfide Rubber Production, Ethylene Propylene Rubber Production, Butyl Rubber Production, and Neoprene Production;
  • Epoxy Resins Production and Non-nylon Polyamides Production (03/08/95) which includes the following production processes: Epoxy Resins Production and Non-nylon Polyamides Production;
  • Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology (06/29/99): Acetal Resins Production; and
  • Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology (06/29/99): Hydrogen Fluoride Production.

The full EPA notice is available at www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3pfpr.html.

Download Center

HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Free Safety Management Software Demo

    IndustrySafe Safety Management Software helps organizations to improve safety by providing a comprehensive toolset of software modules to help businesses identify trouble spots; reduce claims, lost days, OSHA fines; and more.

  • The Top 5 Safety and Technology Trends to Watch

    Get the latest on trends you can expect to hear more about in 2019, including continued growth of mobile safety applications, wearable technology, and smart PPE; autonomous vehicles; pending OSHA recordkeeping rulemaking; and increased adoption of international safety standard, ISO 45001.

  • Analyze Incident Data

    Collect relevant incident data, analyze trends, and generate accurate regulatory reports, including OSHA 300, 300A, and 301 logs, through IndustrySafe’s extensive incident reporting and investigation module.

  • Safety Training 101

    When it comes to safety training, no matter the industry, there are always questions regarding requirements and certifications. We’ve put together a guide on key safety training topics, requirements for certifications, and answers to common training questions.

  • Conduct EHS Inspections and Audits

    Record and manage your organization’s inspection data with IndustrySafe’s Inspections module. IndustrySafe’s pre-built forms and checklists may be used as is, or can be customized to better suit the needs of your organization.

  • Industry Safe
comments powered by Disqus

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - January 2019

    January / February 2019


      Production vs. Safety 
      Meeting the Requirements for Emergency Equipment
      The State of Contractor Safety
      The Three Keys to Effective Chemical Management
    View This Issue