No Change in Marijuana's Classification

DEA rules that marijuana will remain classified in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, for drugs of abuse with "no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States" and "lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision."

The Drug Enforcement Administration has rejected a nine-year-old petition seeking to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, holding that it meets the three criteria for placing a substance in Schedule I under 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1):

  • Marijuana has a high potential for abuse,
  • Marijuana has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and
  • There is a lack of accepted safety for use of marijuana under medical supervision.

The petition was submitted Oct. 9, 2002, by the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis and asked that marijuana be rescheduled as "cannabis" in either schedule III, IV, or V. The coalition asserted that cannabis has an accepted medical use in the United States, is safe for use under medical supervision, has an abuse potential lower than schedule I or II drugs, and has a dependence liability that is lower than schedule I or II drugs.

In a June 21, 2011, letter, DEA Administrator Michele M. Leonhart responded that based on a scientific and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendation from the Department of Health and Human Services, which recommended that marijuana remain in schedule I, DEA has concluded that there is no substantial evidence that marijuana should be removed from schedule I.

"Marijuana has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. According to established case law, marijuana has no 'currently accepted medical use' because: The drug's chemistry is not known and reproducible; there are no adequate safety studies; there are no adequate and well-controlled studies proving efficacy; the drug is not accepted by qualified experts; and the scientific evidence is not widely available," Leonhart wrote in part.

Comments

Thu, Jul 14, 2011 Bill Suncook NH

Marijuana is naturally grown and not a processed drug that man made. Nothing is added to it to enhance it. It can be grown and harvested almost anywhere at a much lower cost than those drug labs spend producing man made drugs with all kinds of side effects. Also this plant can be made into clothing, rope, medication, etc. If the US grew it and exported it in all its different forms like I mentioned we would add jobs and reduce our national dept in the long run. It is safer than alcohol and cigarettes for that matter yet those drugs are legal. I don't understand.

Wed, Jul 13, 2011 Ja-ohs

Most of our young male factory workers,not to mention agricultural workers, use marijuana-its a cultural norm.Many of the older manual workers will be far more productive after the morning "spliff".Obviously, same as alcohol, they dont smoke in a formal job setting, but certainly on the Construction site and in the fields.Dont get me started on medicinal uses-our renowned doctors have isolated Asmasol for asthma and Canasol for Glaucoma; both used for years and effective .So this DEA report is just as outlined above-to maintain the whole power/politics/status quo.But as a professional intimately involved in accident reports/causation etc, I can show the stats where alcohol is involved!!!Thats the killer, not to mention violence and MVA's.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

Substances, both legal and illegal, cause impairment which can lead to workplace accidents, incidents and fatalities. Pot is no different and people who use it will come to work. One only need to look at the transit industry that had a major fatality as a direct result of a pot intoxicated employee, which ultimately led to the present drug testing programs under DOT. If people want to use it, stay home, off the roads, and out of work. Otherwise it poses a significant risk to personal and public safety, just like oxycodone, benadryl, LSD, heroin, and on and on. There are plenty of legitimate medical alternatives to Pot; removing it from Schedule I only gives the potheads further fodder for their arguments.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

Tell your Congressional Representatives - It is time to "Change the Schedule of Cannabis, Cannabis Laws, and Drug Czar Laws" Read and Sign the petition at http://www.change.org/petitions/change-the-schedule-of-cannabis-cannabis-laws-and-drug-czar-laws After you sign the petition, email your friendlies, share on facebook, or twitter from the petition page. If you have a website grab the widget so your visitors can sign it without leaving your website. This petition uses laws passed by Congress to point out that by their laws, the laws must change.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011 Sinjin Smythe Washington DC

How is it that the DEA is actually in charge of the substance's classification? Is it not the very height of hypocrisy that an organization, whose function it is to enforce unjust laws against the subtance's consumers is also the same organization that gets to decide its classification? What are the chance the DEA will ever decide to change the classification? This is about job security, if the DEA loses pot they will be reduced to two guys sharing an office in a warehouse.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011 Stewart

A lot of articles have been saying lately that there is potential for abuse with marijuana. I have to wonder exactly what constitutes abuse. I've been using it on occasion now for 40 years. This is not because I am addicted in any way shape or form. Indeed I have quit several times for many months at a time just because I wanted to. I started back up because I wanted to. I enjoy it the same way people enjoy chocolate cake. It should absolutely be made legal at the federal level since it is much safer than alcohol and people are going to use it legal or not. Give us a safer legal choice. The 100 million+ Americans that have tried it are not all criminals! I'm an ex-marine, a good productive tax-paying citizen, and I've never hurt anyone. I am not a criminal any more than the person who occasionally likes to drink wine with their meal!

Mon, Jul 11, 2011 everybody_knows

Pot has to stay illegal to preserve the drug war. Without it being illegal we would have to stop defining drugs in black and white terms, and the laws would loose moral traction. The drug war is highly profitable for 2nd and 3rd world politicians and allows us to justify foreign military presences in such places. It also allows for internal police power here, and keeps blame blame for this nation's decline where it belongs, on drug users. Why would we want to change this functional system?

Mon, Jul 11, 2011 Devin

Well, my first comment got censored... So just let me say this in a way the moderator may approve of. The DEA has ignored science and public opinion. Michelle Leonhart does not seem to care about the American people since more harm clearly comes from prohibition than from marijuana. Seriously, if she is incapable of coming to that conclusion she is an idiot. But I don't think she is an idiot... She knows! I salute those very few politicians that actually believe in freedom and in our constitution. They include Ron Paul and Gary Johnson in particular. Most politicians seem to care only about getting payoffs from lobbiests; that would certainly seem to include Republican Lamar Smith.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011 Bronx Coqui Bronx, NY

It's all about money, today tomorrow & the future. If cannabis is leagalized, it would hurt many an industry. All these corporations provide monies for politicians to run for office, they're afraid of losing those supposed campaign contributions. The government knows that cannabis does indeed have medical benefits, they just choose to ignore it. With the mountain of evidence that proves cannabis is safe, it's just a matter of time before it becomes legal. I just hope it's in my lifetime!

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

The editors here should be called "censors."

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

Well, alcohol is the same thing and they still made it legal. The only difference is it's in a bottle. Get real, whoever wants it is gettin it anyways.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

The government's prohibition is dangling by this very thin thread. Medicine is not reproducible except it has been produced for thousands of years, been used by people since the dawn of civilization for medicine. There seems to be not a single instance where the drug is unsafe. I see doctors on the tv and radio all the time saying they would prescribe the drug.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

This only shows that the government thinks that we are idiots. At this point in time, MANY MANY people have at least tries marijuana and have realized that it is not NEAR what the gov. is TRYING to cram down their throat. Please give me the reason that alcohol is illegal. A drug that gets thousands of people violently killed each year, whether it be by vehicle accident, or wife abuse...the list goes on. Marijuana, when placed next to alcohol is mild in effect, and NOW...MOST EVERYONE knows this and the gov. is STILL going to spew this crap. The gov. is afraid of the free thinking that MJ might permit. The government is afraid people will realize what a big piece of crap that they really are. Thanks mom and dad. For looking out for. our best interest in the land of the free . I guess the government would rather have an unlimited amount of oxi, vicodin and other pain killers on the streets so the masses can be zombified..because that is exactly what has happpened. A highly addictive, opiate based drug is readily available to anyone who wants them. I know of 3 people off of the top of my head who are consumed by these drugs....and marijuana is the problem. Good job DEA...get the monkeys back in the cage so that we can crank up the think tank again. In an age of supposed progression, it seems as if the gov is ALWAYS going backwards.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011

Why do narrow minded, ignorant and uneducated ppl get appointed to so far reaching positions that r obviously far bejond their cognitive abilities?
Because we get brain washed by the media to elect narrow minded, ignorant and uneducated politicians!
When is this country waking up to the mountain of overwhelming evidence outside the US, where it is legal to study the substance?
(not that there wasn't any clear evidence here in the US)

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Follow Us

Upcoming Webinars

6/19: Building a Fall Protection Plan and a Safer Workplace

This webinar will help companies write a detailed, site-specific fall protection plan that addresses their fall protection goals.

7/10: Combustible Dust: From Sparks to Fires to Explosions Identifying Precursors to Catastrophic Events

This webinar will provide valuable information on how partnering with the nation’s fire service assists facility owners, managers, and OHS professionals in identifying combustible dust hazards, preventing incidents, and reducing liability.

7/18: The United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals, (GHS), will it revolutionize workplace safety?

We invite you to join us as we identify some of the pitfalls of GHS and some real solutions that can be implemented in your workplace today to simplify your chemical information and training program and enable your employees to work more safely with hazardous materials.

7/25: SPCC Regulations: What Do They Look Like Now?

This webinar will address the history and current status of EPA's Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which is intended to prevent the discharge of oil to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

9/19: Shrinking Exposure Thresholds: Stay Ahead of the Game

The truth is that sensor technology is evolving rapidly and Dräger will show you how to trust this technology to stay ahead of the game.

Spotlight

For June 2013, OH&S puts the spotlight on: