NRC Board Denies Hearing on Holtec Planned Storage Facility

While the three judges agreed some of the six petitioners met the qualifications for standing, they concluded the nearly 50 contentions raised were not admissible for an evidentiary hearing, holding that the contentions either were not relevant to the application or did not establish a genuine dispute with aspects of the application.

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board on May 7 denied requests by several petitioners to hold an evidentiary hearing challenging Holtec International's license application to build and operate a Consolidated Interim Storage (CIS) facility for spent nuclear fuel in southeastern New Mexico. Holtec initially sought approval to store 50 canisters containing spent fuel for 40 years.

Holtec's site is located 32 miles east of Carlsbad, N.M., and 34 miles west of Hobbs, N.M.

The commission announced that the three-judge board held oral arguments in Albuquerque in January on the standing of the various petitioners and the admissibility of their proposed contentions under NRC regulations. While the judges agreed some of the six petitioners met the qualifications for standing, they concluded the nearly 50 contentions raised were not admissible for an evidentiary hearing, holding that the contentions either were not relevant to the application or did not establish a genuine dispute with aspects of the application.

The NRC's hearing process allows interested parties who might be affected by a proposed licensing action to challenge the application on technical (safety) or environmental grounds. Most hearings are conducted by licensing boards appointed from the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, a group of administrative judges independent of the NRC staff. Board rulings may be appealed to the full commission.

Holtec, a vendor of dry cask storage systems, has proposed to store spent nuclear fuel from U.S. commercial nuclear power plants at a facility in Lea County, in the southeastern corner of New Mexico. Hearing petitions were filed by Beyond Nuclear, the Sierra Club, and the Fasken Land and Minerals and Permian Basin Land and Royalty Owners, which were granted standing. Two other petitioners – a coalition of several different organizations and NAC International, a rival dry storage cask vendor – were denied standing, and the standing of the sixth petitioner, the Alliance for Environmental Strategies, was not decided.

comments powered by Disqus

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - June 2019

    June 2019

    Featuring:

    • ASSP SAFETY 2019 PREVIEW
      New Orleans Networking
    • NATION SAFETY MONTH
      Heed These Summer Safety Tips
    • TRAINING
      Education, Skill Development, and Behavior Change
    • SAFETY MANAGEMENT
      What Good Looks Like
    View This Issue