Commission Opens Penalty Phase in San Bruno Case

With an independent audit and a report from CPUC's Consumer Protection and Safety Division exposing Pacific Gas and Electric Company's repeated decisions to postpone maintenance, the penalty consideration case opened Jan. 12 could result in "very significant fines" against the utility.

The penalty consideration case opened Jan. 12 by the California Public Utilities Commission in the San Bruno gas pipeline explosion could be very expensive for Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Criminal charges may yet be brought, possibly supported by two documents released last week by the commission. They are an independent audit by Overland Consulting of Leawood, Kansas, and a report from CPUC's Consumer Protection and Safety Division.

The Sept. 9, 2010, explosion of a 30-inch natural gas transmission pipeline owned and operated by PG&E resulted in eight deaths, damage to 70 homes, and the destruction of 38 homes. The Consumer Protection and Safety Division report determined that PG&E violated the Public Utilities Code and several federal and state pipeline safety regulations and also did not follow accepted industry standards when it installed the section of pipe that failed in San Bruno, according to the commission. The audit showed the utility's Gas Transmission & Storage unit was under significant budgetary pressure from 2008 through 2010, and maintenance and integrity management budgets were set far below the requested amounts. Some integrity management projects were deferred to future years to save money. The audit says PG&E's corrective maintenance backlog experienced large increases in 2008, 2009, and 2010.

Opening the case concludes the CPUC staff's investigation into the pipeline rupture "and means a formal enforcement action, leading to possible penalties and other remedies, has now been launched by the CPUC," the agency announced. "The case will not be solely limited to the events that took place on September 9, 2010, but will include all past operations, practices, and other events or courses of conduct that could have led to or contributed to the pipeline rupture in San Bruno."

"The National Transportation Safety Board, the Independent Review Panel, and CPSD have presented us with sufficient information and good cause to move to this new phase and determine whether safety violations have occurred with respect to PG&E before, during, and after the San Bruno pipeline rupture, and if so, the proper remedies for such violations," said CPUC President Michael R. Peevey. "We are now essentially giving PG&E its day in court. If we determine PG&E has violated the law, we are prepared to impose very significant fines."

In fact, NTSB's report on the explosion said the pipe would not have met quality control or welding standards when it was installed in 1956. If the CPUC had not permitted grandfathering of older pipelines since 1961 and DOT had not permitted it since 1970, that pipeline "would have undergone a hydrostatic pressure test that would likely have exposed the defective pipe that led to this accident," the safety board concluded. It also said there is "no safety justification for the grandfather clause exempting pre-1970 pipelines from the requirement for post-construction hydrostatic pressure testing."

CPUC Commissioner Timothy Alan Simon, who is a member of the Pipeline Safety Task Force between the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners and DOT's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, said the timing of the penalty consideration case "is very appropriate as we have before us the complete investigation reports from the National Transportation Safety Board, the Independent Review Panel, and our Consumer Protection and Safety Division." He added, "I believe this proceeding is going to show utilities the need to re-examine their response protocols, risk assessment, and records management for pipeline safety."

Public hearings will be held as part of the case, and the commission will specifically consider what level of fines and other remedies to levy to ensure this type of catastrophe does not recur, commissioners said. For more information on the case, including the division's report, visit For information on steps CPUC is taking to improve pipeline safety, visit audit is available at and the NTSB report at

Download Center

HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Safety Management Software - Free Demo

    IndustrySafe Safety Software’s comprehensive suite of modules help organizations to record and manage incidents, inspections, hazards, behavior based safety observations, and much more. Improve safety with an easy to use tool for tracking, notifying and reporting on key safety data.

  • Create Flexible Safety Dashboards

    IndustrySafe’s Dashboard Module allows organizations allows you to easily create and view safety KPIs to help you make informed business decisions. Our best of breed default indicators can also save you valuable time and effort in monitoring safety metrics.

  • Get the Ultimate Guide to OSHA Recordkeeping

    OSHA’s Form 300A posting deadline is February 1! Are you prepared? To help answer your key recordkeeping questions, IndustrySafe put together this guide with critical compliance information.

  • The 4 Stages of an Incident Investigation

    So, your workplace has just experienced an incident resulting in the injury or illness of a worker. Now what? OSHA recommends that you conduct investigations of workplace incidents using a four-step system.

  • Why Is Near Miss Reporting Important?

    A near miss is an accident that's waiting to happen. Learn how to investigate these close calls and prevent more serious incidents from occurring in the future.

  • Industry Safe
comments powered by Disqus

Free Whitepaper

Stand Your Ground: A Guide to Slip Resistance in Industrial Safety Footwear

This white paper helps to clarify this complexity, so you can better navigate the standards and better ensure the safety of your employees.

Download Now →

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - November December 2019

    November/December 2019


      Redefining Compliance for the Gas Detection Buyer
      Don't Trip Over the Basics
      What to Look for in Head-to-Toe PPE Solutions
      Effective PPE for Flammable Dust
    View This Issue