Plutonium Spill at NIST Unit Prompts Promises of Safety Improvement

Responding to shortcomings highlighted by a June 9 spill of plutonium at its Boulder, Colo., laboratory, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced on Wednesday that it will implement specific improvements to its safety programs called for in a new report by a NIST internal committee. Consistent with recommendations published July 30 by NIST's Ionizing Radiation Safety Committee (IRSC), the agency said it will re-evaluate its organizational lines of responsibility and accountability for safety programs, seek independent assessments of its safety management, expand and strengthen its safety office, and develop a comprehensive plan for corrective action with dates for completing specific measures.

In addition, in a recent letter to the City of Boulder, NIST outlined plans to conduct an assessment and inspection of hazardous materials on the Boulder campus; to audit safety and training procedures for hazardous materials; and to benchmark with other federal agencies about their handling, treatment, and monitoring of hazardous waste materials and to implement any best practices not already being implemented on the NIST Boulder site.

The IRSC report incorporates and expands upon previous reviews of the plutonium spill by five nationally known radiation health and safety experts, by NIST's own health and safety personnel, and by the NIST unit in which the spill occurred. The committee found that a failure in the safety management system, exacerbated by a "casual and informal research environment that appears to have valued research results above safety considerations," is the most probable root cause of the incident. The committee further recommends that NIST strengthen its "safety culture" by securing the commitment and active participation of senior NIST management and effectively integrating safety management practices into core NIST management functions.

The new report examines circumstances and actions leading up to and including the spill of powdered material from a vial containing about 1/4 gram (1/100th of an ounce) of plutonium. It identifies causes, immediate corrective actions, and underlying weaknesses in NIST's safety management. The report is the first phase of a comprehensive investigation. The incident was reported to the NRC, which has been inspecting NIST's actions, including its response to the incident and its plans to decontaminate the lab. NIST has already stopped use of radioactive materials in research at its Boulder laboratories.

"The failure to properly recognize the significant hazards associated with a powdered plutonium source contained only by a glass bottle had devastating consequences for the subsequent events," the report states, citing a number of "missed opportunities" to intervene in the chain of events, such as the failure to conduct an appropriate hazard analysis at the time the plutonium sample was purchased. According to the report, some personnel involved in the incident seemed unaware of required or appropriate procedures or controls. In other cases, they seemed to know them but failed to apply them correctly. Sometimes they recognized a requirement (e.g., for basic radiation safety training) but failed to take appropriate action. In addition, the committee found that managers for the affected unit did not exercise oversight until after the spill occurred.

Several weeks after the incident, to address this issue, NIST announced that its managers had been required to re-certify that all employees, guest researchers, and others working in its laboratories or offices have all training necessary to do their jobs safely. The IRSC also found fault with itself for failing to ensure that the plutonium source would not exceed the capabilities of the NIST Boulder radiation protection program.

Download Center

HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Get the Ultimate Guide to OSHA Recordkeeping

    OSHA’s Form 300A posting deadline is February 1! Are you prepared? To help answer your key recordkeeping questions, IndustrySafe put together this guide with critical compliance information.

  • Steps to Conduct a JSA

    We've put together a comprehensive step-by-step guide to help you perform a job safety analysis (JSA), which includes a pre-built, JSA checklist and template, steps of a JSA, list of potential job hazards, and an overview of hazard control hierarchy.

  • Levels of a Risk Matrix

    Risk matrices come in many different shapes and sizes. Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively.

  • Free Safety Management Software Demo

    IndustrySafe Safety Management Software helps organizations to improve safety by providing a comprehensive toolset of software modules to help businesses identify trouble spots; reduce claims, lost days, OSHA fines; and more.

  • Industry Safe
TenCate FR Technology

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - October 2020

    October 2020

    Featuring:

    • FACILITY SECURITY
      EHS Compliance: Make it Personal
    • FOOT PROTECTION
      Choosing the Right Safety Shoe for Your Industry
    • HAND PROTECTION
      A Requirements Checklists for Work Safety Gloves
    • COVID-19 MANAGEMENT
      Contemporary Issues in HSE Management
    View This Issue