ITC Terminates Nitrile Glove Infringement Investigations

Today's Federal Register includes a U.S. International Trade Commission notice that ends two consolidated investigations, No. 337-TA-608 and No. 337-TA-612, that were based on complaints filed by Tillotson Corp., which sold its Best Glove unit to Showa Glove of Japan last year. The notice, issued Dec. 22, says the commission has affirmed an administrative law judge's Aug. 25, 2008, determination that Tillotson's asserted patent claims at issue in the cases are invalid.

The cases began in July 2007 when Tillotson filed complaints alleging more than 30 companies were importing and selling nitrile gloves imported in the United States that infringed on its claims of U.S. Patent No. Re. 35,616, "Elastomeric Covering Material and Hand Glove Made Therewith" (published Sept. 30. 1997), which was a reissue of surrendered Patent No. 5,014,362, also owned by Tillotson. There also has been federal court litigation over the patent in Georgia, Delaware, and the District of Columbia, according to a July 30, 2008, memorandum opinion by U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia in Ansell Healthcare Products LLC, et al. v. Tillotson Corporation, Civil Action No. 08-585.

The administrative law judge found that the majority of accused gloves infringe claims 17, 18, and 19 of the 35,616 patent, but the asserted claims are invalid. "He concluded that when the patentees amended the claims through a reissue application filed more than two years after the grant of the original patent, they improperly enlarged the scope of the claims, rendering them invalid. The ALJ further concluded that the claims are invalid because the patentees filed a defective reissue declaration when applying for the reissue patent. He rejected other arguments of invalidity and unenforceability. Accordingly, the ALJ concluded that respondents had not violated section 337," according to ITC's notice.

Tillotson and some respondents sought review of the determination, and the commission took briefs and submissions, leading to the Dec. 22 affirmation and termination of the investigations.

Download Center

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program.

  • Job Hazard Analysis Guide

    This guide includes details on how to conduct a thorough Job Hazard Analysis, and it's based directly on an OSHA publication for conducting JHAs. Learn how to identify potential hazards associated with each task of a job and set controls to mitigate hazard risks.

  • A Guide to Practicing “New Safety”

    Learn from safety professionals from around the world as they share their perspectives on various “new views” of safety, including Safety Differently, Safety-II, No Safety, Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), Resilience Engineering, and more in this helpful guide.

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • EHS Software Buyer's Guide

    Learn the keys to staying organized, staying sharp, and staying one step ahead on all things safety. This buyer’s guide is designed for you to use in your search for the safety management solution that best suits your company’s needs.

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - June 2022

    June 2022

    Featuring:

    • SAFETY CULTURE
      Corporate Safety Culture Is Workplace Culture
    • HEAT STRESS
      Keeping Workers Safe from Heat-Related Illnesses & Injuries
    • EMPLOYEE HEALTH SCREENING
      Should Employers Consider Oral Fluid Drug Testing?
    • PPE FOR WOMEN
      Addressing Physical Differences
    View This Issue