The National Transportation Safety Board Outlines Pittsburgh Bridge Collapse

The National Transportation Safety Board Outlines Pittsburgh Bridge Collapse

PennDOT announces selection of the team to rebuild fallen Fern Hollow Bridge.

Officials in Pennsylvania are moving forward on building a replacement for the Fern Hollow Bridge in Pittsburgh, which collapsed on January 28, selecting a team of HDR Inc. and Swank Construction to design and construct the new structure and the approval of $25.3 million in federal funds for the project. The team "mobilized to the site an February 3 and began work," Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation spokesperson Alexis Campbell said.

According to an article, the National Transportation Safety Board, which has launched an in-depth probe of the collapse, has released an interim report of the accident, which caused no fatalities but resulted in injuries to 10 people in vehicles that were on the bridge at the time of the collapse. As expected, the report, issued on February 7, includes factual details, but does not contain findings of the collapse's probable cause. That finding will be part of the NTSB’s final report, which will not be finished for perhaps 12 to 18 months, according to Chair Jennifer Homendy.

The interim report does, however, include some specific details. For example, it states, “Initial assessment of bridge components indicates that the collapse initiated at the west end of the structure.”

“Although certain areas of the welded steel girders were identified as being fracture critical, no primary fractures were found in these areas.” The report also states that “further examination will be performed as debris from the bridge is removed and unobstructed access becomes available.”

In addition, the NTSB report describes the 447-foot-long, four-lane bridge in detail, noting that it “was an uncoated weathering steel, three-span, continuous rigid 'K' frame structure with two welded steel girders, welded steel floor beams and rolled steel stringers.” The report continues. "The ends of the structure rested on reinforced concrete caps on stone masonry abutments. Each girder was additionally supported by two inclined, welded steel frame legs, also made of uncoated weathering steel, which rested atop concrete thrust blocks.”

NTSB also indicated that its investigation will cover the bridge’s design, condition, maintenance, rehabilitation, inspection and load-rating history. It added that it plans a forensic examination of several of the bridge's structural components, and said, “The recovery of evidence, including extraction and documentation, is expected to be a lengthy process.”

NTSB said, “All aspects of the collapse remain under investigation while the NTSB determines the probable cause, with the intent of issuing safety recommendations to prevent similar events.”

The report recounts details of the collapse, many reported earlier by media outlets. At about 6:40 a.m., when the bridge fell about 100 feet into Frick Park below, four passenger vehicles and an articulated Port Authority of Allegheny County bus were on the bridge. A fifth vehicle drove off the east abutment, according to NTSB. The bridge had a posted weight limit of 26 tons.

The Federal Highway Administration said that on February 1, it authorized PennDOT to use $25.3 million in federal formula funding for the project. Of that, $22.6 million will come from the Highway Infrastructure Program’s bridge replacement and rehabilitation funds. The other $2.7 million from the National Highway Performance Program.

Download Center

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program.

  • Job Hazard Analysis Guide

    This guide includes details on how to conduct a thorough Job Hazard Analysis, and it's based directly on an OSHA publication for conducting JHAs. Learn how to identify potential hazards associated with each task of a job and set controls to mitigate hazard risks.

  • A Guide to Practicing “New Safety”

    Learn from safety professionals from around the world as they share their perspectives on various “new views” of safety, including Safety Differently, Safety-II, No Safety, Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), Resilience Engineering, and more in this helpful guide.

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • EHS Software Buyer's Guide

    Learn the keys to staying organized, staying sharp, and staying one step ahead on all things safety. This buyer’s guide is designed for you to use in your search for the safety management solution that best suits your company’s needs.

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - July August 2022

    July / August 2022


      Specific PPE is Needed for Entry and Exit
      Three Quick Steps to Better HazCom Training
      Building a Chemical Emergency Toolkit
      The Last Line of Defense
    View This Issue