High Court Shoots Down Dukes Class Action

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held June 20 that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals erred by certifying a class action involving about 1.5 million women who worked for Wal-Mart in a case alleging discrimination in pay and promotions. The decision in the case, Wal-Mart v. Dukes, is a big victory for the retailer and a relief to other national employers.

The class in this case would have included all women who worked at a domestic Wal-Mart store since Dec. 26, 1998. Wal-Mart could have been ordered to pay millions of dollars if it lost the case at trial.

In a majority opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court held that this huge class lacks commonality that is capable of classwide resolution. "Here respondents wish to sue about literally millions of employment decisions at once. Without some glue holding the alleged reasons for all those decisions together, it will be impossible to say that examination of all of the class members' claims for relief will produce a common answer to the crucial question why was I disfavored," Scalia wrote.

There are 3,400 domestic Wal-Mart stores, Scalia wrote, and the plaintiffs filed around 120 affidavits relating to about 235 of those stores to support their allegations of discrimination. "More than half of these reports are concentrated in only six States (Alabama, California, Florida, Missouri, Texas, and Wisconsin); half of all States have only one or two anecdotes; and 14 States have no anecdotes about Wal-Mart's operations at all," he wrote. "Even if every single one of these accounts is true, that would not demonstrate that the entire company 'operate[s] under a general policy of discrimination,' . . . which is what respondents must show to certify a companywide class."

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg filed an opinion concurring in the result but dissenting from the method; Ginsburg said the class might be certifiable if plaintiffs show that common class questions predominate over issues affecting individuals and that a class action is superior to other ways of adjudicating the claims. Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined her opinion.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and several other organizations filed briefs in support of Wal-Mart in the case, which was argued before the high court in March 2011.

Posted by Jerry Laws on Jun 17, 2011


Product Showcase

  • Preventative Heat Safety

    Dehydration and heat exposure impair physical and cognitive performance. Proper hydration boosts heat stress resilience, but hydration needs are highly individualized and hard to predict across a workforce. Connected Hydration® empowers industrial athletes to stay safe through behavioral interventions, informed by sports science, and equips safety teams with critical insights to anticipate high-risk situations and adapt to evolving environmental factors. Curious about applying the latest in sports science based hydration strategies for industrial athletes? Stop by booth #1112 at AIHA or schedule a free demo today at https://epcr.cc/demo. Read More

  • The MGC Simple Plus

    The MGC Simple Plus is a simple-to-use, portable multi gas detector that runs continuously for three years without being recharged or routinely calibrated after its initial charge and calibration during manufacturing. The detector reliably tests a worksite’s atmosphere for hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, oxygen and combustible gases (LEL). Its durability enables the detector to withstand the harshest treatment and environments, hence earning it an IP 68 rating. The MGC Simple Plus is also compatible with a variety of accessories, such as the GCT External Pump. Visit gascliptech.com for more information. Read More

  • HAZ LO HEADLAMPS

    With alkaline or rechargeable options, these safety rated, Class 1, Div. 1 Headlamps provide long runtime with both spot and flood options in the same light. Work safely and avoid trip hazards with flexible hands-free lighting from Streamlight. Read More

Featured

Webinars