Leading Expectations

Positive expectations are definitely helpful—as long as they're in balance.

Seems like everyone has their slant on expectations. This ranges from "Always aim high" to "Better not to have them." Or "expect the best, prepare for the worst." Then there's essayist Anne Lamott's: "Expectations are premeditated disappointments."

What's clear is: a) expectations are crucial to performance and b) they can cut several ways. Expectations pave a crossroads. They're mindsets that stem from past experiences that are projected into the future. If a person has a history of failing, the default is to expect him to again fall short. Organizationally, one expectational path can lead to "what's-the-use?" dissatisfaction, the other to significantly higher performance.

Expectations pretty much always exist. They're the opposite of pure mindfulness, where only the "Now" is noted and past experiences and biases don't overshadow. It's hard, bordering on impossible, to not have some kind of expectations (then, I've not met anyone I consider an "enlightened," ever-mindful being.) I've heard some contend, "I have no expectations anything will change," by which they really mean they have a negative, give-up expectation of stasis, that the status quo will continue, that standing problems won't be solved or that negative momentum will continue downhill.

Highly accomplished leaders understand the potential power and pitfalls of expectations and do their best to steer toward improvement and away from dissatisfaction. Many would-be agents of improvement don't grasp how leading expectations is as much an art as a science. Insightful leaders know that expectations can be positive or negative—and each has advantages and pitfalls.

People tend to be satisfied when their expectations are exceeded and disgruntled when getting less than they expected. So, some say, why not just set very low expectations? Because of the downsides of harboring negative expectations. Such a low mindset creates perpetual uphill battles. People caught in this often opt out before any change process even begins. ("It's just our management re-examining their navels again.") Some adopt a negative outlook to protect themselves from being continuously let down. They disengage way before giving changes a chance.

However, when leaders can overcome negative expectations, this can wake up, energize, and motivate buy-in and further upgrades. This is a main reason we request active resisters be included when we train workers as Safety Catalysts within client companies. Time and again, turning around naysayers dramatically elevates others' receptivity and excitement around Safety.

A positive expectation mindset can convince yourself and others you’re confident. This can be infectious. Such "Positive Thinking" makes it more likely you'll look for and take advantage of opportunities that arise, even with negative occurrences. What happens if your orders are down yet there are still expectations of continuous Safety improvement? Do you cut training and staff and Safety efforts or, like Honda, tap this slower time as an opportunity to ramp up Safety training that was tougher to schedule when things were go-go?

Remember that having overly positive expectations has definite downsides:

1. It can blindside you. When focusing only on aimed for improvements, it's easier to gloss over indications that performance is slipping. The path of change often looks like the ups and downs chart of a highly successful stock. But if I assume that our company is improving straight line and people are happy with their work, it’s easy to interpret silence on the plant floor as a sign of contentment and miss that it might instead reflect tension, fear, or disgruntlement. Or by assuming a manager is able to drive productivity he’ll be an equally strong Safety advocate.

2. Like an over-inflated balloon, highly positive expectations can deflate the ability to flex and prevail if things fall short or expectations/plan go badly wrong. Just as a Pollyanna mindset may underestimate obstacles in the way of making something positive happen. ("No problem, it will all work out somehow.")

3. One-sided positive expectations can set up everyone for disappointment (leading to bailout?) when down cycles occur. And only-positive futurists can lose leadership credibility.

4. Too positive expectations can lead to resting on organizational laurels. I've seen several companies that moved from subpar to average to good Safety performance who became overly satisfied with their accomplishments, expecting they no longer had to work as hard to get better, that they could coast. But the only coasting that's self-perpetuating runs downhill.

Positive expectations are definitely helpful—as long as they're in balance. Start by mindfully watching your own default expectations. What do you accept as "inevitable" in Safety performance? If you believe that older workers are bound to break down, it's likely that workers will begin accepting this as well, and that you won't put in the effort needed to actually make significant improvements (or, at best, just halfheartedly go through some motions to show you've tried).

If you expect a quick and effortless intervention will transform ongoing and significant injury problems—that you can "fix" longstanding, cumulative soft-tissue injuries by showing a video, writing yet another lifting policy and procedure, exhorting workers to "lift with their legs," handing out backbelts—you and everyone else are likely to be disappointed and your Safety performance flatten. Rather, shift your expectations toward making small, critical changes in ergonomics, training, and structure that can significantly impact these pervasive injuries (see my many articles on this for specifics).

Unearth your own underlying expectations; chart those of others; create and implement a strategy for refining, clearly communicating and watching both the subtle and measurable results of managerial and worker mindsets.

This article originally appeared in the September 2016 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

Download Center

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program.

  • Job Hazard Analysis Guide

    This guide includes details on how to conduct a thorough Job Hazard Analysis, and it's based directly on an OSHA publication for conducting JHAs. Learn how to identify potential hazards associated with each task of a job and set controls to mitigate hazard risks.

  • A Guide to Practicing “New Safety”

    Learn from safety professionals from around the world as they share their perspectives on various “new views” of safety, including Safety Differently, Safety-II, No Safety, Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), Resilience Engineering, and more in this helpful guide.

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • EHS Software Buyer's Guide

    Learn the keys to staying organized, staying sharp, and staying one step ahead on all things safety. This buyer’s guide is designed for you to use in your search for the safety management solution that best suits your company’s needs.

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - June 2022

    June 2022


      Corporate Safety Culture Is Workplace Culture
      Keeping Workers Safe from Heat-Related Illnesses & Injuries
      Should Employers Consider Oral Fluid Drug Testing?
      Addressing Physical Differences
    View This Issue