This is the type of NRR label currently used on hearing protectors.

NHCA Agrees More Time Needed to Retest Hearing Protectors

The National Hearing Conservation Association's comments on the EPA proposal recommend simpler labels, 42 months to retest and relabel protectors, and requiring a statement on the labels saying individual quantitative fit testing is the only way to estimate a user's attenuation.

The National Hearing Conservation Association has submitted comments to EPA about its proposed update of the regulation governing how hearing protection devices are tested and labeled. NHCA makes eight recommendations in its comments, asking that EPA specify simpler labels, based label values on ANSI S12.6-2008 Method B rather than Method A, and extend the proposed window for retesting and relabeling protectors from 30 to 42 months, the latter divided into a 24-month interim period when only products with the current labels are sold and an 18-month transition period when products could be sold with old or new labels. Once the 18 months had ended, only products with the new labels could be sold.

This sample depicts the new type of hearing protector label EPA has proposed. "Noise-induced hearing loss is a progressive and permanent disease which has a pervasive impact on people's lives. While noise control efforts are the preferred way to reduce occupational and community noise exposures and prevent hearing loss, many Americans depend on ear plugs and ear muffs to protect their hearing," said NHCA President Rick Neitzel, Ph.D., CIH. "The current Noise Reduction Rating methodology is obsolete and needs to be updated to reflect a more real-world approach to hearing conservation. Also, the new NRR needs to account for the fact hearing protectors are used both in the workplace, where users should be trained on how to protect their hearing and how to wear protectors correctly, as well as recreationally, where users are likely to be less knowledgeable about how to best protect their hearing."

The association's letter is posted here. NHCA asks that EPA require a statement on the labels saying individual quantitative fit testing is the only way to estimate a user's attenuation. And it asks that labels no longer emphasize user "motivation" as a reason some might achieve greater attenuation than others. "Many factors can contribute to attenuation achieved, including physiology, condition of the device, etc.," the letter states.

This is the type of NRR label currently used on hearing protectors.The letter recommends that label values be based on the ANSI S12.6-2008 Method B protocol, which accounts for hearing protectors fitted by trained and naïve users alike. "The EPA should also ensure that the de-rating of labeled values is eliminated from the new NRR scheme. Over the years, de-ratings have created a great deal of uncertainty and confusion that has diminished the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs in the United States," Neitzel said. "The required labels should be simplified, made more symbol-based, and provided in multiple languages to ensure that their correct use is clear for all users. Supporting information, such as the performance of the protector at specific test frequencies, should be provided online, as a packaged insert or upon request from the manufacturer in order to further simplify package labeling."

Download Center

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program.

  • Job Hazard Analysis Guide

    This guide includes details on how to conduct a thorough Job Hazard Analysis, and it's based directly on an OSHA publication for conducting JHAs. Learn how to identify potential hazards associated with each task of a job and set controls to mitigate hazard risks.

  • A Guide to Practicing “New Safety”

    Learn from safety professionals from around the world as they share their perspectives on various “new views” of safety, including Safety Differently, Safety-II, No Safety, Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), Resilience Engineering, and more in this helpful guide.

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • EHS Software Buyer's Guide

    Learn the keys to staying organized, staying sharp, and staying one step ahead on all things safety. This buyer’s guide is designed for you to use in your search for the safety management solution that best suits your company’s needs.

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - July August 2022

    July / August 2022


      Specific PPE is Needed for Entry and Exit
      Three Quick Steps to Better HazCom Training
      Building a Chemical Emergency Toolkit
      The Last Line of Defense
    View This Issue