This is the type of NRR label currently used on hearing protectors.

NHCA Agrees More Time Needed to Retest Hearing Protectors

The National Hearing Conservation Association's comments on the EPA proposal recommend simpler labels, 42 months to retest and relabel protectors, and requiring a statement on the labels saying individual quantitative fit testing is the only way to estimate a user's attenuation.

The National Hearing Conservation Association has submitted comments to EPA about its proposed update of the regulation governing how hearing protection devices are tested and labeled. NHCA makes eight recommendations in its comments, asking that EPA specify simpler labels, based label values on ANSI S12.6-2008 Method B rather than Method A, and extend the proposed window for retesting and relabeling protectors from 30 to 42 months, the latter divided into a 24-month interim period when only products with the current labels are sold and an 18-month transition period when products could be sold with old or new labels. Once the 18 months had ended, only products with the new labels could be sold.

This sample depicts the new type of hearing protector label EPA has proposed. "Noise-induced hearing loss is a progressive and permanent disease which has a pervasive impact on people's lives. While noise control efforts are the preferred way to reduce occupational and community noise exposures and prevent hearing loss, many Americans depend on ear plugs and ear muffs to protect their hearing," said NHCA President Rick Neitzel, Ph.D., CIH. "The current Noise Reduction Rating methodology is obsolete and needs to be updated to reflect a more real-world approach to hearing conservation. Also, the new NRR needs to account for the fact hearing protectors are used both in the workplace, where users should be trained on how to protect their hearing and how to wear protectors correctly, as well as recreationally, where users are likely to be less knowledgeable about how to best protect their hearing."

The association's letter is posted here. NHCA asks that EPA require a statement on the labels saying individual quantitative fit testing is the only way to estimate a user's attenuation. And it asks that labels no longer emphasize user "motivation" as a reason some might achieve greater attenuation than others. "Many factors can contribute to attenuation achieved, including physiology, condition of the device, etc.," the letter states.

This is the type of NRR label currently used on hearing protectors.The letter recommends that label values be based on the ANSI S12.6-2008 Method B protocol, which accounts for hearing protectors fitted by trained and naïve users alike. "The EPA should also ensure that the de-rating of labeled values is eliminated from the new NRR scheme. Over the years, de-ratings have created a great deal of uncertainty and confusion that has diminished the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs in the United States," Neitzel said. "The required labels should be simplified, made more symbol-based, and provided in multiple languages to ensure that their correct use is clear for all users. Supporting information, such as the performance of the protector at specific test frequencies, should be provided online, as a packaged insert or upon request from the manufacturer in order to further simplify package labeling."

Download Center

  • Industrial Premium Library

    Empower your workforce with the manufacturing, industrial maintenance, operations, HSE, compliance, and professional development skills they need to complete their tasks efficiently and safely. Not only will you boost productivity, reliability, skills, and morale but you’ll also onboard faster, and retain your best employees while meeting regulatory standards. Vector Solutions offers over 1,800 award-winning eLearning courses designed to keep your employees safe, transfer knowledge of fundamentals, and develop industry and job-specific skills that reduce downtime, maintenance costs and more.

  • Safety Metrics & Insights Webinar

    EHS professionals have been tackling the subject of how to best measure performance for many years. Lagging indicators like the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and Days Away Restricted Transfer Rate (DART) are a good place to start, but you shouldn’t forget about the leading indicators that your workforce does every day to prevent incidents from occurring. Learn about some of the most common KPIs of safety programs and how Vector EHS Management software can be used to track these metrics in this webinar.

  • Risk Matrix Guide

    Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively. Download this guide for details on risk matrix calculations including severity, probability, and risk assessment.

  • OSHA Recordkeeping Guide

    In case you missed it, OSHA recently initiated an enforcement program to identify employers who fail to electronically submit Form 300A recordkeeping data to the agency. When it comes to OSHA recordkeeping, there are always questions regarding the requirements and ins and outs. This guide is here to help! We’ll explain reporting, recording, and online reporting requirements in detail.

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - September 2022

    September 2022


    • ESG
      EHS Will Guide Future ESG Success for Many Organizations
      Handling Material Handlers: Training Beyond PIT Requirements
      The Missing Link with EHS Software
      Noise Surveys from the Trenches
    View This Issue