How Accurate is Your Monitor?

The answer could depend on your calibration process.

WHEN you consider the many regulations and guidelines that health and safety officers and first responders are faced with, it is amazing they maintain the ability to detect such a wide variety of hazardous pollutants and toxic agents. There is no lack of regulations governing how to monitor chemical compounds, and the list grows longer all the time. New standards for portable gas monitors by the International Safety Equipment Association are a prime example. As well, EPA has several monitoring standards for volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants (method 25a and method 18).

While these regulations deal with detection of different chemicals, all of them stress a common concern: Detection instruments must be calibrated correctly. This is the only way to safeguard against false positives, false negatives, or incorrect measurements of target chemical compounds. The challenge here is that often instrument calibration is accomplished using surrogate gases. Propane or methane, for example, can be used to calibrate a monitor for up to 188 different hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) using EPA method 25a regulations.

Why don't we calibrate the monitor using the actual compound we wish to detect? Primarily because many chemical compounds cannot be easily put into a compressed gas cylinder and allow for easy calibration. This leads to another question: "If I am not calibrating my instrument with the same chemical compound that I am testing, can I really expect to receive accurate performance from my detector?" The answer, unfortunately, is no.

As an example, if you are detecting for acetone using an instrument that was calibrated using ethane, instrument response for 100 ppm acetone will be incorrect. The chemicals are from different structure groups, so you cannot measure them accurately calibrating the instrument with the different structures.

Also you must consider whether or not interference gases may affect you. If you are monitoring for a particular gas but there are other gases present that alarm the monitor, you must to know how to distinguish between them. In this case, you must take an interference gas (or combination of gases) to decrease the chances of a false positive. For instance, if you are monitoring for carbon disulfide and there is a coal-burning power plant across the street emitting sulfur dioxide, the monitor may go off. You have to be able to recognize exactly what you are measuring for via calibration and the level of outside interference.

Profitable Options
Creating calibration gases for different compounds is a challenge because of the fact that some compounds cannot be made in a gas form, because either their boiling point is too high or their vapor pressure is too low. In this case you may want to try permeation tubes, but they have other, worse restrictions on temperature maintenance and altitude that may make them worthless.

Fortunately, however, most HAPs can be made in calibration gas form; they should always be used to calibrate your instruments whenever possible. Though they may involve greater calibration expense, these mixtures can save your facility a great deal of time and expense, not to mention prevent a possible violation of regulations.

Take, for example, the case of a power plant that burns natural gas and is required by the state to monitor for VOCs. Its personnel did an ambient test using method 25a for a portable GC and failed for the ppm levels of hazardous air pollutant compounds. However, there is a composter in operation just a few blocks away. The power plant personnel speciated the hazardous air pollutant (or VOC) to low level hydrogen sulfide calibration gas. It was determined that it was stronger on a part of the plant's property where its source plume was not drifting; rather, the prevailing winds and HAP typically came from the composter. As a result, the plant petitioned the state that it should not have to monitor for HAPs based on the results of the test. The power plant won, and its permit was changed.

The key, then, is to determine whether a gas of the specific pollutant or compound for which you wish to monitor is available. Because it is possible to have gas mixtures containing more than 100 different components, be sure to ask your gas supplier for the proper mixture. Also, be sure to determine whether there are interference gases present that could create a problem with detection.

This article appeared in the September 2006 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

This article originally appeared in the September 2006 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

Download Center

HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Incident investigation guide

    Need some tips for conducting an incident investigation at work after there’s been an occupational injury or illness, or maybe even a near miss? This guide presents a comprehensive overview of methods of performing incident investigations to lead you through your next steps.

  • Steps to Conduct a JSA

    We've put together a comprehensive step-by-step guide to help you perform a job safety analysis (JSA), which includes a pre-built, JSA checklist and template, steps of a JSA, list of potential job hazards, and an overview of hazard control hierarchy.

  • Levels of a Risk Matrix

    Risk matrices come in many different shapes and sizes. Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively.

  • Free Safety Management Software Demo

    IndustrySafe Safety Management Software helps organizations to improve safety by providing a comprehensive toolset of software modules to help businesses identify trouble spots; reduce claims, lost days, OSHA fines; and more.

  • Industry Safe
Bulwark FR Quiz

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - July August 2020

    July August 2020

    Featuring:

    • CONFINED SPACES
      Addressing Confined Spaces and Heat Stress Concerns
    • PROTECTIVE APPAREL
      Why Daily Wear FR Garments Make Sense No Matter the Season
    • HAND PROTECTION
      The Magic of New Technology
    • CHEMICAL SAFETY
      Why Effective Chemical Safety Training is More Important Than Ever
    View This Issue