The LEED-certified, 1.6 million-square-foot Minneapolis Convention Center features 475,000 square feet of exhibit space and 87 meeting rooms. (Minneapolis Convention Center photo)

Yucca Mountain Workers' Health Concerns Highlighted

A May 20 session at AIHce EXP 2019 explored heightened respiratory and radiation exposure hazards workers may face if Congress moves the High Level Nuclear Waste repository forward.

MINNEAPOLIS -- Workers at the Yucca Mountain Project in Nevada could be exposed to potentially serious respiratory and radiation hazards if the long-planned High Level Nuclear Waste repository is revived and advanced by Congress, two presenters explained in an educational session at this week's AIHce EXP 2019 conference and expo here.

Dr. William Culbreth, Ph.D., a nuclear and mechanical engineer who teaches in the UNLV Department of Mechanical Engineering, explained that the original plan for Yucca Mountain was to store 70,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel forever in steel containers buried about 1,000 feet below ground. That depth is still 1,000 feet above the water table at the arid site, which is located about 150 miles northwest of Las Vegas. The area receives only about 3.5 inches of rain per year on average.

Culbreth told a large crowd at the session that southern Nevada's population has exploded since surface studies began at Yucca Mountain in 1991. Unresolved issues include how to get the high level waste to Yucca Mountain from the many nuclear reactors where it is currently stored, volcanic and seismic activity in the area, and a national monument which was created recently in the path of a rail route that had been proposed back in the 1990s. Peak criticality, or the peak of the time when the spent fuel could go critical, is projected to be 250,000 years, and DOE currently projects that the site should be able to contain the hazardous materials for 1 million years.

Culbreth said challenges for Yucca Mountain Project workers include possible exposures when containers corrode, criticality concerns because of migration of groundwater through the site, and how to shield workers from radiation during placement of the containers in their alcoves. If the Nuclear Regulatory Commission does approve the site's license, Culbreth said he believes worker safety must be considered before construction and operations take place.

The second speaker, Dr. Jacob Paz, Ph.D., of Environment Inc. in Las Vegas, discussed groundwater issues and the dangers of workers' exposure to erionite, an asbestos-like material that is present in the soil in the area but is more carcinogenic than asbestos. Current plans for Yucca Mountain are to entomb 77,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, plus more than 200,000 tons of heavy metals, Paz said. "It's a huge amount of material. This material, if leaching to the surface, is not nuclear waste. It's a hazardous waste that you have to clean," he added.

Synergistic effects of exposure to various substances at the site should be studied, he said, adding that to assume that container corrosion will be negligible, as the U.S. Department of Energy does, is "nonsense."

Paz said DOE must revise its current Yucca Mountain Project erionite guidelines, exposure limit, and/or standard and should screen workers and their family members for adverse health effects.

Download Center

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program.

  • Job Hazard Analysis Guide

    This guide includes details on how to conduct a thorough Job Hazard Analysis, and it's based directly on an OSHA publication for conducting JHAs. Learn how to identify potential hazards associated with each task of a job and set controls to mitigate hazard risks.

  • A Guide to Practicing “New Safety”

    Learn from safety professionals from around the world as they share their perspectives on various “new views” of safety, including Safety Differently, Safety-II, No Safety, Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), Resilience Engineering, and more in this helpful guide.

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • EHS Software Buyer's Guide

    Learn the keys to staying organized, staying sharp, and staying one step ahead on all things safety. This buyer’s guide is designed for you to use in your search for the safety management solution that best suits your company’s needs.

  • Vector Solutions

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - June 2022

    June 2022


      Corporate Safety Culture Is Workplace Culture
      Keeping Workers Safe from Heat-Related Illnesses & Injuries
      Should Employers Consider Oral Fluid Drug Testing?
      Addressing Physical Differences
    View This Issue