UK Engineering Firm Fined After Pressure Testing Explosion

Filtration Service Engineering Ltd had pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the Health and Safety Executive reported.

A Worcestershire engineering firm, Filtration Service Engineering Ltd, has been fined £30,000 (about $50,000 in U.S. dollars) and ordered to pay £15,325 (about $26,000) in costs on Feb. 20 after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 in connection with a 2011 pressure testing explosion, the Health and Safety Executive reported.

The agency's report said its investigators found Filtration Service Engineering was testing a 335-liter vessel "because there were concerns about the quality of the welding. However, instead of simply filling it with water, the firm decided to use compressed air." When it exploded on Dec. 8, 2011, part of it struck employee Clive Dainty, 51, who was seriously hurt as a result. Both of his legs were amputated, and he suffered head injuries and has severely restricted movement in his arms, according to HSE's report, which said the force of the explosion also threw a fire extinguisher through a nearby wooden staircase.

The factory's compressed air supply was directly connected to one of the vessel's openings, the report says. "The injuries sustained in this incident were more akin to those sustained on a battlefield," HSE Inspector Ed Fryer said. "The vessel exploded like a bomb during the course of a normal working day, and everyone in the factory was at risk from the operation because no measures were put in place to protect them. Pneumatic testing is a dangerous activity and significant planning is required to ensure the risks are managed. The management of health and safety in this factory was woefully inadequate and simple measures could have been implemented to prevent the incident from happening. An assessment of the risks involved in pneumatic pressure testing should have identified that air was not a suitable testing medium. The test could have been carried out by simply filling the vessel with water."

"It is a miracle that more people were not injured and that nobody lost their life," Fryer added.

Information about the safety requirements for pressure testing can be found here.

Download Center

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • Online Safety Training Buyer's Guide

    Use this handy buyer's guide to learn the basics of selecting online safety training and how to use it at your workplace.

  • COVID Return-to-Work Checklist, Fall 2021

    Use this checklist as an aid to help your organization return to work during the COVID-19 pandemic in a safe and healthy manner.

  • SDS Buyer's Guide

    Learn to make informed decisions while searching for SDS Management Software.

  • Risk Matrix Guide

    Risk matrices come in many different shapes and sizes. Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively.

  • Industry Safe

Featured Whitepapers

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - October 2021

    October 2021

    Featuring:

    • TRAINING
      On Route To Safe Material Handling
    • SAFETY CULTURE
      Normalization of Deviations in Performance
    • IH:INDOOR AIR QUALITY
      Arresting Fugitive Dusts
    • PPE:FOOT PROTECTION
      Safety Shoes Make the Outfit for Well-Protected Workers
    View This Issue