EPA Again Taking Comments on Perc in Drinking Water

Wednesday's notice opened a new comment period until Sept. 18 and noted EPA received 32,975 comment letters after announcing Oct. 10, 2008, a preliminary determination that perchlorate did not meet the second and third criteria for regulation. But 32,632 of those were mass-mailed opposing letters.

It's back to the drawing board, comment-wise, for EPA's attempt to determine whether it should regulate perchlorate according to amended section 1412 of the Safe Drinking Water Act. To regulate a contaminant in drinking water, EPA must determine it meets three criteria, and the agency announced Oct. 10, 2008, its preliminary determination that perchlorate did not meet the second and third criteria. This triggered a cascade of 32,975 comment letters, 96 percent of which were mass-mailed opposing letters, EPA said in Wednesday's announcement of a new comment period until Sept. 18.

These are the criteria: (1) The contaminant may have an adverse effect on human health, (2) the contaminant is known to occur or there is a substantial likelihood that the contaminant will occur in public water systems with a frequency and at levels of public health concern, and (3) regulation of such contaminant presents a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public water systems. To date, EPA has made final regulatory determinations for 20 contaminants but has not found any of them meets all three criteria.

The agency said it was left with 1,163 comment letters that would be considered "unique," with 30 of them providing detailed comments and six of those supporting the preliminary determination.

"These additional comments are sought in an effort to ensure consideration of all the potential options for evaluating whether there is a meaningful opportunity for human health risk reduction of perchlorate through a national primary drinking water rule," Wednesday's notice states.

The relevant comments questioned EPA's use of its Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to estimate the iodide uptake inhibition for these sensitive life stages -- the pregnant woman and fetus, the lactating woman and neonate, and the young child -- consuming food and drinking water containing perchlorate. Based on comments received, EPA said it is re-evaluating how best to incorporate the PBPK modeling analysis into its evaluation of perchlorate, if at all.

Product Showcase

  • HAZ LO HEADLAMPS

    With alkaline or rechargeable options, these safety rated, Class 1, Div. 1 Headlamps provide long runtime with both spot and flood options in the same light. Work safely and avoid trip hazards with flexible hands-free lighting from Streamlight. 3

  • SwabTek® Cannabis Test Kit

    The SwabTek® Cannabis Test Kit is a single-use spot test designed for use in screening for cannabis compounds in any sample type or on any surface. The test is capable of identifying the presumed presence of cannabinoids in very small quantities, with a level of detection as little as 6 μg in mass. Learn more about the SwabTek® Cannabis Test Kit and the rest of SwabTek surface drug testing solutions through the webinar titled "Everything You Want To Know About Surface Testing" 3

  • Preventative Heat Safety

    Dehydration and heat exposure impair physical and cognitive performance. Proper hydration boosts heat stress resilience, but hydration needs are highly individualized and hard to predict across a workforce. Connected Hydration® empowers industrial athletes to stay safe through behavioral interventions, informed by sports science, and equips safety teams with critical insights to anticipate high-risk situations and adapt to evolving environmental factors. Curious about applying the latest in sports science based hydration strategies for industrial athletes? Stop by booth #1112 at AIHA or schedule a free demo today at https://epcr.cc/demo. 3

Featured

Webinars