FAA Requires Ice Protection Changes for Transport Aircraft

The agency's review of aircraft in-flight icing safety began after two crashes in the Midwest in 1994 and 1997 that killed 68 and 29 people, respectively.

Acting because of accidents and incidents in which flight crews did not operate the airframe ice protection system (IPS) in a timely manner, and also because of concerns over crews' workload when they must manually cycle an IPS when they see ice accumulating, the Federal Aviation Administration issued a final rule yesterday requiring that transport aircraft certificated for flight in icing conditions have a system that operates continuously, a system that automatically cycles the IPS, or an alert to the crew each time the IPS must be cycled.

The final rule will take effect Sept. 2, 2009; it will ensure crews have a clear means to know when to activate the IPS and will reduce the workload, FAA said.

FAA said it began a review of aircraft in-flight icing safety after two accidents, one in 1994 and another in 1997, that caused the National Transportation Safety Board to issue recommendations A-96-56 and A-98-91. This final rule partially addresses those safety recommendations.

A-96-56 was based on an Oct. 31, 1994, crash of American Eagle Flight 4184 near Roselawn, Ind., where the plane was in a holding pattern because of weather delays at its destination, Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. The plane nosedived while descending from 10,000 to 8,000 feet, and all 64 passengers and four crew members were killed, according to NTSB's online database. This recommendation asked FAA to revise its icing certification testing regulation so crews would have a means to positively determine when they are in icing conditions that exceed the limits for the aircraft's certification. A-98-91 was issued after a COMAIR Airlines plane crashed on Jan. 9, 1997, near Monroe, Mich., en route from Cincinnati to Detroit. All 26 passengers and three crew members were killed. This recommendation asked FAA to require turboprop aircraft manufacturers to update the icing information in their manuals and training programs, emphasizing that leading edge deicing boots should be activated as soon as the airplane enters icing conditions.

FAA said it received 14 comments when it proposed the rule, and some minor amendments were made as a result. The Airline Pilots Association, NTSB, BAE Systems Regional Aircraft, and The Boeing Company expressed support for the rule; NTSB and other commenters suggested specific improvements or clarifications.

The final rule includes this language: "The FAA acknowledges that it is not a simple task to design and certificate an ice detection system. However, ice detection systems exist today that meet the reliability requirements of part 25. Section 25.1309 ensures the degree of reliability of an airframe IPS is commensurate with the hazard level associated with the failure of the airframe IPS. In response to the contention that an ice detector would not be economically feasible, the FAA notes that on recent part 25 airplane certifications manufacturers sought and received approval for installation of ice detectors without an FAA requirement for such a system. Therefore, the FAA infers that these manufacturers consider the installation of ice detectors economically feasible."

Download Center

  • Industrial Premium Library

    Empower your workforce with the manufacturing, industrial maintenance, operations, HSE, compliance, and professional development skills they need to complete their tasks efficiently and safely. Not only will you boost productivity, reliability, skills, and morale but you’ll also onboard faster, and retain your best employees while meeting regulatory standards. Vector Solutions offers over 1,800 award-winning eLearning courses designed to keep your employees safe, transfer knowledge of fundamentals, and develop industry and job-specific skills that reduce downtime, maintenance costs and more.

  • Safety Metrics & Insights Webinar

    EHS professionals have been tackling the subject of how to best measure performance for many years. Lagging indicators like the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and Days Away Restricted Transfer Rate (DART) are a good place to start, but you shouldn’t forget about the leading indicators that your workforce does every day to prevent incidents from occurring. Learn about some of the most common KPIs of safety programs and how Vector EHS Management software can be used to track these metrics in this webinar.

  • Risk Matrix Guide

    Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively. Download this guide for details on risk matrix calculations including severity, probability, and risk assessment.

  • OSHA Recordkeeping Guide

    In case you missed it, OSHA recently initiated an enforcement program to identify employers who fail to electronically submit Form 300A recordkeeping data to the agency. When it comes to OSHA recordkeeping, there are always questions regarding the requirements and ins and outs. This guide is here to help! We’ll explain reporting, recording, and online reporting requirements in detail.

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - September 2022

    September 2022

    Featuring:

    • ESG
      EHS Will Guide Future ESG Success for Many Organizations
    • MACHINE GUARDING
      Handling Material Handlers: Training Beyond PIT Requirements
    • EHS SOFTWARE
      The Missing Link with EHS Software
    • HEARING PROTECTION
      Noise Surveys from the Trenches
    View This Issue