Managing the Risks of a Defective Product

Product recalls are an extreme action, but they help companies to protect customers, reduce litigation costs, and preserve their reputations.

A company’s brand name is often its most valuable asset. A brand name takes years to develop but can be irreparably harmed in an instant if a trusted brand causes harm to the consumers who have grown to rely on it.When a company learns that one of its products has caused harm to one or more of its customers, it needs to take swift action to prevent future harm to its consumers and to salvage its brand name.

A company may learn of problems with its products through a number of sources, including customer complaints, claims, news coverage, and regulatory agencies such as the U.S.Consumer Product Safety Commission or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The problem may be the result of a design defect,manufacturing defect, malicious tampering, accidental contamination, misbranding, or mislabeling.Whatever the reason for the defect, the company must decide what it will do to address the problem. Immediate action is necessary to protect customers, to protect the brand name, and to comply with the requirements of the regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over the specific product.

Recalls Are Rising
Product recalls are an extreme and expensive remedy,but in recent years they have occurred with increasing regularity. In January 2008, the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s Web site listed more than 30 recalls of a variety of products—from air compressors to toy train sets.During that same month,FDA’s Web site listed more than 20 recalls, market withdrawals, and safety alerts.

The number of recalls has increased dramatically in the past decade. In 2000, FDA reported approximately 80 recalls,market withdrawals, and safety alerts. In 2007, that number rose to 375. The reason for the increase is unclear. The cynical view is that product quality is in a steep decline. Alternatively, it might be that companies are taking a more proactive approach to warning their customers of known defects. Although they constitute an extreme action, product recalls help companies to protect their customers, reduce their litigation costs,and preserve their reputation and brand name.

Deciding Whether to Recall a Product
The decision of whether a company should initiate a product recall depends on a number of factors, including whether the defect affects safety, the risk of physical harm to customers, the involvement of regulatory agencies, and the cost of the recall.While a product recall can be a costly endeavor for a company—often,much higher than production costs—the cost of not conducting a recall can be even greater. The longer a dangerous and defective product remains in the market, the greater the risk of product liability lawsuits and the potential for both civil and criminal action by regulatory agencies.

If a product is monitored by federal agencies, there may be mandatory notification requirements. Many federal agencies regulate products, including CPSC; FDA; the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S.Department ofAgriculture; the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and the Federal Aviation Administration. Each agency has rules and regulations that producers of certain products must follow in the manufacturing of their goods, and in some instances, the agency provides guidelines regarding product recalls.

First-party costs
In August 2007, Castleberry Food Company faced a product recall following a botulism scare. Castleberry’s parent company, Connors Bros., estimated the recall of 90 different brands of the company would cost approximately $40 million. The cost of a recall can be very high, depending on the size of the company, the number of products affected, and the number of its consumers. The cost of not taking a proactive approach to guarding the health and safety of your consumers from a known danger, however, can be much higher, a determination Castleberry made in deciding to go ahead with its recall.

Liability to third parties
When a product is the subject of a recall, the first concern is often liability issues related to the consumers of that product. In addition to the purchasers and users of its products, however, a company might be liable to its distributors and other third parties, such as other companies that incorporate the component or ingredient into their own product. A recall of that component or ingredient may cause the third-party manufacturer to suffer an interruption to its business, loss of profits, and damage to its reputation because of the recall of the product.

Third-party liability might not be a concern if the company only sells its products under its own label or sells its product directly to consumers. If the product is incorporated into other products, however, then the recall’s affect on other manufacturers will likely increase the associated expense.

Protection through Insurance Coverage Some of the steep costs associated with product recalls can be defrayed by insurance coverage. General product liability coverage, however, does not usually cover the costs associated with a product recall.While general product liability coverage is still essential for claims brought by consumers, there are many other risks associated with a product recall that a company must mitigate.

To alleviate those risks, a growing number of insurance carriers offer product recall coverage.To be properly prepared, a company should organize a corporate team that will be responsible for identifying triggers to determine when a recall might be necessary. The team also should be organized to implement the recall process swiftly if necessary. Having a crisis management plan in place before a company is confronted with the decision of whether to conduct a recall can minimize the costs of a recall, reduce litigation, and prevent adverse publicity that can scar a brand name. In addition to proper protocol preparation, a company’s quick response to a defective product is the key to reducing the risk of others being harmed by the product, thus reducing the company’s exposure to liability.

This article originally appeared in the September 2008 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

Product Showcase

  • Full Line of Defense Against Combustible Dust Nilfisk

    Nilfisk provides a comprehensive range of industrial vacuums meticulously crafted to adhere to NFPA 652 housekeeping standards, essential for gathering combustible dust in Class I, Group D, and Class II, Groups E, F & G environments or non-classified settings. Our pneumatic vacuums are meticulously engineered to fulfill safety criteria for deployment in hazardous surroundings. Leveraging advanced filtration technology, Nilfisk ensures the secure capture of combustible materials scattered throughout your facility, ranging from fuels, solvents, and metal dust to flour, sugar, and pharmaceutical powders. Read More

  • HAZ LO HEADLAMPS

    With alkaline or rechargeable options, these safety rated, Class 1, Div. 1 Headlamps provide long runtime with both spot and flood options in the same light. Work safely and avoid trip hazards with flexible hands-free lighting from Streamlight. Read More

  • Preventative Heat Safety

    Dehydration and heat exposure impair physical and cognitive performance. Proper hydration boosts heat stress resilience, but hydration needs are highly individualized and hard to predict across a workforce. Connected Hydration® empowers industrial athletes to stay safe through behavioral interventions, informed by sports science, and equips safety teams with critical insights to anticipate high-risk situations and adapt to evolving environmental factors. Curious about applying the latest in sports science based hydration strategies for industrial athletes? Stop by booth #1112 at AIHA or schedule a free demo today at https://epcr.cc/demo. Read More

Featured

Artificial Intelligence

Webinars