The University of California System Improves Lab Safety by Using DuPont Nomex

On a December afternoon in 2008, within the research laboratories of the University of California (UC) in Los Angeles, a routine procedure went terribly wrong.

On a December afternoon in 2008, within the research laboratories of the University of California (UC) in Los Angeles, a routine procedure went terribly wrong. As a young technician transferred a small amount of tert-butyllithium from one container to another, the plastic syringe she was using came apart in her hands. Immediately, the chemical--a highly reactive, "pyrophoric" compound--burst into flames. Within moments, the lab assistant was covered in severe burns. She died of her injuries 18 days later.

An investigation into the incident yielded a critical detail: At the time of the fire, the lab assistant wasn't wearing any protective clothing. If it hoped to avoid similar tragedies in the future, UC would need to institute a comprehensive program to purchase, distribute, and encourage the correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE), especially flame-resistant (FR) garments.

A System-wide Challenge

Compared to industrial settings, academic research labs pose unique challenges to worker safety. Industrial labs are highly regulated. Academic labs aren't. Industrial labs tend to have stable, long-term workforces and established (and regularly reinforced) safety protocols. Academic labs don't. In the case of the UC system, there was another compounding factor: size. The UC research program employs thousands on 10 campuses statewide and at the renowned Lawrence Berkeley, Lawrence Livermore, and Los Alamos national laboratories. Subjects under study at UC facilities range from molecular chemistry to primate health, genetic modification to nuclear physics. In such a diverse, geographically distributed program with so many "moving parts," potential hazards are legion. A one-size-fits-all approach was simply out of the question.

For help, UC turned to the San Jose, California-based consulting company Environmental & Occupational Risk Management, Inc. (EORM), which recommended that the school get a handle on the challenge by administering the Laboratory Hazard Assessment Tool (LHAT) to its research employees. The online survey was designed to identify the nature and scope of the hazards present at each research lab within the UC system.

Armed with a better picture of the everyday risks its employees faced, UC was now well-positioned to begin evaluating the protective attributes of various garment types and fabrics, from untreated cotton and untreated cotton/polyester blends to chemically treated fabrics, and finally, garments made from inherent FR fibers. UC had stringent criteria, and rightly so. Apart from the university system's pressing safety concerns, the capital outlay for a PPE program of this size would be several million dollars, so choosing the right garments from the start was crucial. Garment purchasing considerations included:

  • Predicted burn injury
  • Reactivity to oxidizers
  • Vulnerability to particle shedding
  • Comfort
  • Durability
  • Design
  • Value in use

At first glance, the comparatively modest initial cost of garments manufactured from chemically treated fabrics made them an attractive choice. But the UC evaluators also understood that over time, the flame resistance of such fabrics is compromised by repeated exposure to some chemicals, including the bleach (sodium hypochlorite) commonly used in commercial laundry operations. Worse still, in some burn tests, chemically treated FR fabrics have shown a tendency to "activate" when exposed to flames in excess of minimum standard required durations. Activation of the chemical treatment generates additional heat, potentially adding to burn injury.

A Clear Winner

After exhaustive trials, the UC evaluators selected the only garments that met their high standards: those made from DuPontTM Nomex® fiber. When exposed to extreme heat, Nomex® fiber reacts in a unique manner. It captures energy rather than conducting it to the wearer's skin, protecting the victim and providing them valuable escape time. And unlike post-treated garments, the heat- and flame-resistant properties of Nomex® are built in--they can't be washed out or worn away. The UC evaluators were also impressed with the fit, light weight, and breathability offered by protective garments made from Nomex®, key factors in their likelihood of being worn.

Back On Campus

UC may have found its winning PPE, but getting it into its employees' hands wouldn't be easy. After all, UC's new PPE policy required that protective garments be distributed to all faculty, staff, volunteers, and visiting scholars who work in UC-affiliated labs, a team of thousands spread throughout the nation's third-largest state.

The answer? A series of "bulk distribution" events on the individual campuses. Promoted through email, social media, and on-campus posters and announcements, the gatherings offered research staff at each UC campus the chance to meet in one place to be individually fitted with their new, improved PPE. Employees were given equipment vouchers based on their lab's original LHAT assessments. At minimum, most received two FR lab coats. A variety of other PPE, such as face shields, splash goggles, and FR aprons were also available by request. Along with their PPE distribution programs, the individual universities have since implemented rigorous training on proper use of their new PPE. For convenience sake, the schools even launder their employees' PPE on request.

Now in its second year, the UC PPE program has all the marks of an institutional success. While there's no way to undo the tragic event that prompted the University of California to renew its commitment to laboratory safety, by investing in testing, training, and garments made from DuPontTM Nomex®, the school has gone a long way toward ensuring that history never repeats itself.

Download Center

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • Online Safety Training Buyer's Guide

    Use this handy buyer's guide to learn the basics of selecting online safety training and how to use it at your workplace.

  • COVID Return-to-Work Checklist, Fall 2021

    Use this checklist as an aid to help your organization return to work during the COVID-19 pandemic in a safe and healthy manner.

  • SDS Buyer's Guide

    Learn to make informed decisions while searching for SDS Management Software.

  • Risk Matrix Guide

    Risk matrices come in many different shapes and sizes. Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively.

  • Industry Safe

Featured Whitepapers

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - October 2021

    October 2021

    Featuring:

    • TRAINING
      On Route To Safe Material Handling
    • SAFETY CULTURE
      Normalization of Deviations in Performance
    • IH:INDOOR AIR QUALITY
      Arresting Fugitive Dusts
    • PPE:FOOT PROTECTION
      Safety Shoes Make the Outfit for Well-Protected Workers
    View This Issue