Dr. David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, assistant secretary of Labor for occupational safety and health

HELP Committee Decides to Bypass Full Hearing for Potential OSHA Chief

Senators on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee overseeing the nomination of epidemiologist David Michaels, Ph.D., as OSHA's next assistant secretary have decided to go with a mostly written question-and-answer format rather than conduct a full hearing. And they won't be getting to it this week. That is the news today from the office of U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, HELP chairman.

Business groups such as the National Association of Manufacturers, the Coalition for Workplace Safety, and the Chamber of Commerce, among others, have been urging panel members to conduct a full-scale hearing on the nominee rather than send his appointment directly to the floor for a vote, but Harkin's office said today that is not going to happen.

Instead, according to Harkin's press secretary Bergen Kenny, "Any member of the committee can ask to meet with the nominee individually, and they can submit written questions, which is what happens most frequently, and then the nominee answers those written questions, and then they can ask follow-up questions to those if they so choose. Then, when we have the hearing, everybody's free to debate it . . . and then vote however they see fit."

As early as Oct. 21 Michaels was one of 11 nominations slated for consideration by the panel, but according to Kenny, written questions were submitted to the nominee too close to that date for him to adequately answer them and provide follow-up feedback. HELP members "didn't feel like they had the time to go through the process before our date," she said. Consequently, the committee's minority and majority staff have agreed to conduct the questions and answers in writing and then meet with the nominee individually if they choose, she said.

"If we had a hearing on every single nominee, nothing would ever get done," Kenny said. "We wouldn't be able to fill all the positions that need to be filled."

Kenny added that HELP would not be getting to Michaels' nomination this week. "We have two hearings already this week, and neither are for that," she said.

Download Center

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program.

  • Job Hazard Analysis Guide

    This guide includes details on how to conduct a thorough Job Hazard Analysis, and it's based directly on an OSHA publication for conducting JHAs. Learn how to identify potential hazards associated with each task of a job and set controls to mitigate hazard risks.

  • A Guide to Practicing “New Safety”

    Learn from safety professionals from around the world as they share their perspectives on various “new views” of safety, including Safety Differently, Safety-II, No Safety, Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), Resilience Engineering, and more in this helpful guide.

  • Lone Worker Safety Guide

    As organizations digitalize and remote operations become more commonplace, the number of lone workers is on the rise. These employees are at increased risk for unaddressed workplace accidents or emergencies. This guide was created to help employers better understand common lone worker risks and solutions for lone worker risk mitigation and incident prevention.

  • EHS Software Buyer's Guide

    Learn the keys to staying organized, staying sharp, and staying one step ahead on all things safety. This buyer’s guide is designed for you to use in your search for the safety management solution that best suits your company’s needs.

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - June 2022

    June 2022


      Corporate Safety Culture Is Workplace Culture
      Keeping Workers Safe from Heat-Related Illnesses & Injuries
      Should Employers Consider Oral Fluid Drug Testing?
      Addressing Physical Differences
    View This Issue