this is an example of a label that may be used to comply with the proposed EPA rule

Hearing on Labeling Rule Delayed to Oct. 7

Comments are now due by Nov. 4 on EPA's proposed rule, which would change the familiar NRR labels on hearing protection devices. The rule takes new technologies and Internet sales of HPDs into account.

The public hearing on EPA's noise labeling proposed rule has now been moved to Oct. 7, and EPA shortly will announce the new deadline to submit comments about the rule is Nov. 4, Dan Shipp, president of the International Safety Equipment Association, said today. Shipp had requested a 90-day extension of the original Sept. 4 deadline for comments on the proposed rule.

Daniel K. Shipp, president of the International Safety Equipment AssociationHearing conservation professionals and manufacturers have been awaiting this rule for several years. It would allow "electronic labeling" for HPDs sold online and proposes a new label giving a range of attenuation rather than the single Noise Reduction Rating found on labels of hearing protection devices (HPDs) today.

The rule's public docket is available at www.regulations.gov to check comments, past studies and reports on HPD performance, and other submissions. A July 2009 report prepared for EPA that is in the docket calculates costs and benefits of the proposal, and this document estimates the total U.S. market for HPDs is $459.1 million and the estimated costs of complying with the proposed rule would be 0.16 to 0.4 percent of those sales. EPA said it identified approximately 1,029 different HPDs that are currently for sale in the United States, including 403 models of ear plugs or semi-aural devices, 572 models of ear muffs sold either alone or incorporated into communication headsets, and 54 models of active noise reduction devices. An additional impulse noise reduction test would be required for approximately 156 of the 1,029 HPDs.

The proposed rule would require recurrent testing for all product categories covered by the regulations to provide a comparison of effectiveness ratings of a product over a period of time and to ensure that labels accurately reflect current effectiveness. The cost analysis considered two recurrent testing periods: three years and five years. Relabeling of an HPD would be required if the recurrent test yields a lesser and/or greater NRR that is more than 3 dB different from the corresponding transition or new product NRR values given on the product label. The cost analysis' authors stated they believe the recurrent testing requirement will encourage new testing laboratories to enter the HPD market; currently there are only four labs conducting such testing on a commercial basis, two being independent and the other two owned by HPD manufacturers.

New test protocols also are in the rule, and all HPDs would have to be tested to determine their NRRs with the new protocols. Manufacturers will be required to submit the test results to EPA within 10 business days of the transition test date.

Download Center

  • Industrial Premium Library

    Empower your workforce with the manufacturing, industrial maintenance, operations, HSE, compliance, and professional development skills they need to complete their tasks efficiently and safely. Not only will you boost productivity, reliability, skills, and morale but you’ll also onboard faster, and retain your best employees while meeting regulatory standards. Vector Solutions offers over 1,800 award-winning eLearning courses designed to keep your employees safe, transfer knowledge of fundamentals, and develop industry and job-specific skills that reduce downtime, maintenance costs and more.

  • Safety Metrics & Insights Webinar

    EHS professionals have been tackling the subject of how to best measure performance for many years. Lagging indicators like the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and Days Away Restricted Transfer Rate (DART) are a good place to start, but you shouldn’t forget about the leading indicators that your workforce does every day to prevent incidents from occurring. Learn about some of the most common KPIs of safety programs and how Vector EHS Management software can be used to track these metrics in this webinar.

  • Risk Matrix Guide

    Understanding the components of a risk matrix will allow you and your organization to manage risk effectively. Download this guide for details on risk matrix calculations including severity, probability, and risk assessment.

  • OSHA Recordkeeping Guide

    In case you missed it, OSHA recently initiated an enforcement program to identify employers who fail to electronically submit Form 300A recordkeeping data to the agency. When it comes to OSHA recordkeeping, there are always questions regarding the requirements and ins and outs. This guide is here to help! We’ll explain reporting, recording, and online reporting requirements in detail.

  • Safety Metrics Guide

    Is your company leveraging its safety data and analytics to maintain a safe workplace? With so much data available, where do you start? This downloadable guide will give you insight on helpful key performance indicators (KPIs) you should track for your safety program

  • Vector Solutions

Featured Whitepaper

OH&S Digital Edition

  • OHS Magazine Digital Edition - September 2022

    September 2022

    Featuring:

    • ESG
      EHS Will Guide Future ESG Success for Many Organizations
    • MACHINE GUARDING
      Handling Material Handlers: Training Beyond PIT Requirements
    • EHS SOFTWARE
      The Missing Link with EHS Software
    • HEARING PROTECTION
      Noise Surveys from the Trenches
    View This Issue