Exposure Determination and Respirator Selection under the OSHA Hexavalent Chromium Standards

Compliance will facilitate the selection process for operations in which respiratory protection is used to control exposures.

The following summarizes key provisions of the Hexavalent Chromium (CrVI) standards potentially affecting the selection and use of respiratory protection for CrVI exposures in the workplace. Where applicable, guidelines assisting employers to comply with OSHA requirements are offered. This summary was prepared by the 3M Occupational Health and Environmental Safety Division and does not represent an official, legal, or complete interpretation of the regulation. If specific questions arise, the regulation itself should be reviewed and relied on, rather than this summary. A copy of the final regulation can be viewed on the OSHA Web site at www.osha.gov.

On Feb. 28, 2006, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration published the final Hexavalent Chromium (CrVI) Standard. Three separate standards covering occupational exposures to CrVI were published, including general industry (1910.1026), shipyards (1915.1026), and construction (1926.1126). A Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 5 ug/m3 was established in all three versions.

OSHA estimates there are approximately 558,000 workers exposed to CrVI, of which 352,000 are exposed above the Action Level of 2.5 ug/m3 and 68,000 above the PEL. According to OSHA, potential adverse health effects associated with CrVI exposures include lung cancer, asthma, and damage to the nasal epithelia and skin. (U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium--Fed. Reg. 71:10099-10385.)

Employers covered under the standards must determine the eight-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to CrVI, using either the scheduled-monitoring option or the performance-oriented option. Respirator selection for CrVI requires information on specific conditions of use, including air concentrations. Compliance with exposure determination requirements of the CrVI standards will assist employers in the selection process for work operations where respirators are used to control CrVI exposures.

Sources of CrVI Exposure
Chromium is a metal that exists in several oxidation or valence states, ranging from Cr-2 to Cr+6 (hexavalent chromium). Chromium compounds of the trivalent state (Cr+3) are the most common and occur naturally in ores such as ferrochromite, or chromite ore. Hexavalent chromium or chromate is the second most stable state; however, it rarely occurs naturally. Chromium compounds in higher valence states (CrVI) are able to undergo reduction to lower valence states in the presence of oxidizable organic matter or the presence of inorganic chemicals such as iron. Likewise, lower valence state chromium compounds are able to undergo oxidation to higher valence states.

Major users of chromium are in the metallurgical, refractory, and chemical industries. Chromium is used to produce stainless steel, alloy steel, and nonferrous alloys. CrVI is used in the chemical industry in pigments, metal plating, and chemical synthesis as ingredients and catalysts. There are about 30 major industries and processes where CrVI is used. These include producers of chromates and related chemicals from chromite ore, electroplating, welding, painting, chromate pigment production and use, steel mills, and iron and steel foundries. CrVI compounds have a lemon yellow, orange, or dark red appearance and are typically crystalline, granular, or powder. Their color characteristics and chemical properties make them suitable for use as high-quality pigments in textile dyes, paints, inks, and plastics.

Welding operations affected by the CrVI standards are those performed on stainless steel and high-chrome content carbon steel, as well as carbon steel welding in confined and enclosed spaces. Fume generated from the welding of stainless steel may contain both trivalent chromium and hexavalent chromium compounds. Fume composition and the rate of generation will depend on the welding process used and filler material used, if any. The International Chromium Development Association indicates the rate of fume generation during welding of stainless steel depends on a number of factors, including welding current (current density), arc voltage (arc length), type of metal transfer (type of filler material and/or welding process), and the shielding gas or welding atmosphere ("Chromium in Stainless Steel Welding Fumes," The Chromium File, Issue No. 9, April 2002. International Chromium Development Association, Paris, France).

The welding processes expected to generate the highest CrVI exposures are shielded-metal arc welding (SMAW) and gas-metal arc welding (GMAW). It's estimated that CrVI accounts for approximately 4 percent of the of the total chromium content in GMAW fume and up to 50 percent of chromium content in SMAW fume. Other types of welding, such as tungsten-arc welding (TIG) and submerged-arc welding (SAW), may also present exposure concerns. However, these processes generally present lower fume volumes compared to SMAW and GMAW.

CrVI exposures also may occur in chromium plating operations. Chromium plating includes hard-chrome and decorative-chrome plating types. Hard-chrome plating is done either to increase resistance to rust and corrosion or increase resistance to wear and tear. Decorative-chrome plating is used for aesthetic purposes in order to achieve a shining surface.

Most chromium plating is done using chromic acid, a hexavalent form of chromium. The main exposure concern is the chromic-acid mist that is formed when chromic acid is electrolyzed. According to the International Chromium Development Association, the amount of chromic-acid mist generated depends on a number of variables, including the concentration of chromic acid in solution, the surface area of the article treated, the current density, the length of time current is passed through the solution, and the surface tension of the bath. ("Health Effects of Occupational Exposures in Chrome Plating," The Chromium File, Issue No. 7, December 2001. International Chromium Development Association, Paris, France.)

Painting applications where CrVI exposures are expected to be the highest involve the use of strontium chromate coatings on aerospace parts. Certain aerospace applications involve spray painting of large parts or entire planes, which may make it difficult to achieve compliance with the PEL using engineering and work practice controls only. OSHA anticipates the use of respiratory protection will be necessary to supplement other exposure controls used. Continued use of chromate-containing paints and coatings will present exposure concerns to downstream users--such as automobile repair, construction, and shipyard industries--for years to come.

Exposure Determination
OSHA allows employers to comply with exposure determination requirements of the CrVI standards using either the scheduled-monitoring option or the performance-oriented option. The scheduled-monitoring option requires initial, personal breathing zone air sample collection in a sufficient quantity to accurately characterize full-shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification and each work area. Subsequent monitoring also is required, with the frequency based on initial results. This approach is similar to what is used in previous substance-specific standards, such as the lead (1910.1025) and asbestos (1910.1001) general industry standards.

The following monitoring schedule is required for CrVI under the scheduled-monitoring option:

  • If initial monitoring indicates exposures are below the action level (2.5 ug/m3), the employer may discontinue monitoring for employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring.
  • If initial monitoring identifies employee exposures to be at or above the action level, the employer must perform periodic monitoring at least every six months.
  • If initial monitoring identifies employee exposures to be at or above the PEL, the employer must perform periodic monitoring at least every three months.

An alternate choice for complying with the exposure determination requirements is the performance-oriented option. When selecting this option, the employer determines the eight-hour TWA exposure for each employee based on any combination of air monitoring data, historical-monitoring data, or objective data sufficient to accurately characterize employee CrVI exposures.

Historical-monitoring data means data from CrVI monitoring conducted prior to May 30, 2006, that is obtained from work operations conducted under workplace conditions closely resembling the process, types of material, control methods, work practices, and environmental conditions used in the employer's current operation.

Objective data means information such as air monitoring data from industry-wide surveys or calculations based on the composition or chemical and physical properties of a substance demonstrating the employee exposure to CrVI associated with a particular product or material or a specific process, operation, or activity. The data must reflect workplace conditions closely resembling the processes, types of material, control methods, work practices, and environmental conditions in the employer's current operations.

Sampling and Analytical Methods
OSHA requires employers to use monitoring and analytical methods that can measure airborne levels of CrVI to within plus or minus 25 percent and can produce accurate measurements with a 95 percent confidence interval for air concentrations at or above the action level. There are a number of recognized methods, including OSHA method ID-215, NIOSH 7600, NIOSH 7604, and NIOSH 7605 (refer to Table 1).

The sampling apparatus for all four methods consists of a 37 mm diameter, 5 um pore size, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) filter contained in a polystyrene cassette holder and a sampling pump operating within a range of 1-4 LPM. Recommended air sample volumes vary slightly.

CrVI analysis is conducted using visible absorption spectrophotometry for NIOSH 7600 and variations of ion chromatography for the NIOSH 7604, NIOSH 7605, and OSHA ID-215 methods. OSHA method ID-215 (1998) and NIOSH 7605 (2003) are the most recently validated methods. Limits of detection are generally lower for these methods, compared to NIOSH 7600 and 7604.

All three NIOSH methods may require special sample handling that includes removal of the PVC filter from the cassette and placement in a glass vial for shipment. All methods may be used for both soluble and insoluble forms of CrVI. However, extraction procedures used may be different for each type. Consult an American Industrial Hygiene Association-accredited laboratory for assistance in selecting the most appropriate sampling and analytical method for your work environment.

Table 1. Summary of Sampling and Analytical Methods for Airborne Hexavalent Chromium

(NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Fourth Edition. OSHA Method ID-215, Hexavalent Chromium in Workplace Atmospheres, June 1998)

Method

Sampling Equipment

Recommended Pump Flow

Analysis

Sample Handling*

NIOSH 7600, issued 8/94

Personal sampling pump with 37 mm diameter PVC filter, 5 um pore size

1 to 4 LPM, 400 L max volume

Visible Absorption Spectropho-tometry--extraction solution different for soluble and insoluble forms

Remove PVC filter from cassette and place in glass vial prior to shipment

NIOSH 7604, issued 8/94

Personal sampling pump with 37 mm diameter PVC filter, 5 um pore size

1 to 4 LPM, 1000 L max volume

Ion Chromato-graphy, Conductivity Detection

Remove PVC filter from cassette and place in glass vial prior to shipment

NIOSH 7605, issued 3/03

Personal sampling pump with 37 mm diameter PVC filter, 5 um pore size

1 to 4 LPM, 400 L max volume

Ion Chromato-graphy with post-column derivatization and UV detection

Remove PVC filter from cassette and place in glass vial prior to shipment

OSHA ID-215, issued 6/98

Personal sampling pump with 37 mm diameter PVC filter, 5 um pore size

2 LPM, 960 L max volume

Ion Chromato-graphy with UV detection

If sample is from spray painting, additional extraction required

* Consult an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)-accredited laboratory prior to sample collection.

Use of Respiratory Protection under the CrVI Standards
Consistent with many substance-specific standards, OSHA requires employers to use engineering controls to reduce and maintain employee CrVI exposures below the PEL. Where this is not feasible, the use of respiratory protection is required to supplement those exposure controls.

Where the employer can demonstrate that employee exposures above the PEL occur fewer than 30 days per year on any specific process or task, the requirement to implement engineering and work practice controls does not apply. Where the employer chooses not to use engineering and work practice controls under these circumstances, the use of respirators is required.

OSHA also has given a special exemption to the aerospace industry, where painting of aircraft or large aircraft parts using CrVI-containing paints is performed. Specifically, the employer must use engineering and work practice controls to reduce employee CrVI exposures below 25 ug/m3 and then supplement with respiratory protection to achieve the PEL.

The use of respiratory protection is also required under the following circumstances:

  • While engineering and work practice controls are being developed;
  • During maintenance and repair activities for which engineering and work practice controls are not feasible;
  • When all feasible engineering and work practice controls are implemented and are still not sufficient to reduce exposures to or below the PEL; and
  • During emergencies.

Unlike previous practice, OSHA chose not to include a table of assigned protection factors (APFs) to assist employers in the respirator selection process. This is because of OSHA's plans to publish an APF table for all respirator types as part of changes to the general industry respiratory protection standard, 29 CFR 1910.134. The APF table will define universal values for the expected workplace level of protection across all respirator types. The addition of an APF table under 1910.134 is expected in 2006.

OSHA specifically requires employers falling under the scope of the CrVI standards to implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134. The anticipated APF table will assist employers in selecting the most appropriate respirator for their CrVI exposure. Using the hazard ratio and APF, employers can select a respirator that is suitable for their exposure conditions. Hazard ratio is calculated by dividing the measured or estimated air concentration by the exposure limit. A respirator with an APF greater than the hazard ratio must be selected. For example, if the measured air concentration for a CrVI exposure is 10 ug/m3 eight-hour TWA, a hazard ratio of 2 is calculated (HR = measured concentration/PEL = 10/5 = 2). A minimum of a half facepiece respirator with an APF of 10 (e.g., filtering facepiece or half facepiece respirator with appropriate particle filter) would be required for this exposure.

3M Respiratory Protection Recommendations
Employers using respiratory protection for CrVI exposures must comply with all requirements of 1910.134--including, but not limited to, medical evaluations, training, and fit testing, prior to using respirators. Fit-testing provisions require that all workers wearing a tight-fitting, half or full facepiece respirator must pass a quantitative or qualitative fit test.

Consistent with current respirator selection practices, 3M offers the general recommendations below for work environments where respirators are required under the CrVI standards:

  • An N-Series particle filter (e.g., N95, N100) approved under 42 CFR Part 84 may be used where no oil aerosols are present.
  • An R-Series (e.g., R95) or P-Series (e.g., P95, P100) particle filter may be used where oil aerosols are present. Refer to product packaging for time use limitations.
  • A filtering facepiece respirator or half facepiece respirator with appropriate particle filters may be used up to 10X PEL (50 ug/m3).
  • A full facepiece respirator with appropriate particle filters may be used to 10X PEL (50 ug/m3) when qualitatively fit tested and 50X PEL (250 ug/m3) when quantitatively fit tested.
  • A powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) or supplied air system with a loose-fitting facepiece may be used up to 25X PEL (125 ug/m3). A HEPA cartridge/filter is required with a PAPR.
  • A PAPR or supplied air system with a full facepiece, hood, or helmet may be used up to 1,000X PEL (5 mg/m3). A HEPA cartridge/filter is required with a PAPR.

Compliance with the exposure determination requirements under the OSHA CrVI standards will facilitate the selection process for those operations where respiratory protection is used to control exposures. In addition to the exposure concentration, knowledge of specific workplace conditions such as the physical state of the contaminant (dust, mist or fume), presence of other gases and vapors, potential for oxygen deficiency, and other environmental conditions (temperature and relative humidity) will help optimize selection.

This article appeared in the October 2006 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

This article originally appeared in the October 2006 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.

Product Showcase

  • SlateSafety BAND V2

    SlateSafety BAND V2

    SlateSafety's BAND V2 is the most rugged, easy-to-use connected safety wearable to help keep your workforce safe and help prevent heat stress. Worn on the upper arm, this smart PPE device works in tandem with the SlateSafety V2 system and the optional BEACON V2 environmental monitor. It includes comprehensive, enterprise-grade software that provides configurable alert thresholds, real-time alerts, data, and insights into your safety program's performance all while ensuring your data is secure and protected. Try it free for 30 days. 3

Featured

Webinars