BP's Hayward Leaving 'By Mutual Agreement'

The chief executive is out effective Oct. 1 and will be nominated as a non-executive director of BP's Russian joint venture.

BP announced today that Chief Executive Tony Hayward is stepping down "by mutual agreement" and has been replaced by Bob Dudley, 54, who came in to take charge of the Gulf of Mexico well capping operation. Hayward leaves the post effective Oct. 1 and will be nominated as a non-executive director of BP's Russian joint venture.

BP chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg said the company's board members were "deeply saddened to lose a CEO whose success over some three years in driving the performance of the company was so widely and deservedly admired. The tragedy of the Macondo well explosion and subsequent environmental damage has been a watershed incident," he continued. "BP remains a strong business with fine assets, excellent people and a vital role to play in meeting the world's energy needs. But it will be a different company going forward, requiring fresh leadership supported by robust governance and a very engaged board."

Dudley joined BP from Amoco after the companies merged in 1998. "I do not underestimate the nature of the task ahead," he said, "but the company is financially robust with an enviable portfolio of assets and professional teams that are among the best in the industry. I believe this combination -- allied to clear, strategic direction -- will put BP on the road to recovery."

BP also announced it intends to sell as much as $30 billion in assets, mainly from its upstream business, within 18 months and is taking a $32.3 billion charge to reflect the impact of the gulf oil spill, including $2.9 billion in costs to date and $29.3 billion for future costs including the promised $20 billion fund to repay damage claims.


"We expect we will pay the substantial majority of the remaining direct spill response costs by the end of the year," Hayward said. "Other costs are likely to be spread over a number of years, including any fines and penalties, longer-term remediation, compensation and litigation costs."


Share this Page


Comments

Mon, Aug 2, 2010 Andy Martin Erie, PA, USA

Heavy is the head that wears the crown...The buck has to stop somewhere and since Mr. Hayward was at the helm when this incident occured it's only right that he be replaced. Perhaps the next exec will place greater importance to safety proceedures; if not, the same fate awaits....

Wed, Jul 28, 2010

His success over three years! Not having an appropriate emergency response to a catastrophe such as this is not success in my book. They have a robust company alright. Explosions and fines in Texas refinery of which OSHA has re-cited them on and now this MESS! Who do you suppose in Washington is on their "professional team"- my guess, probably the enitire US Congress.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Follow Us

OH&S is on Twitter.

Join OH&S Magazine on SafetyCommunity!
Join us on SafetyCommunity!

Upcoming Webinars

2/29: GHS will happen…are you ready?
We invite you to attend this webinar to see how GHS is being used today in several workplaces to enhance worker comprehension and safety.

3/14: 10 Webinar Best Practices. Step-by-step guide to executing a winning webinar
By attending this webinar about webinars, you will learn the what, why and how’s of this exciting, collaborative marketing tool.

Spotlight

For February, OH&S puts the spotlight on:

Poll

OSHA Region 6 Administrator John Hermanson says the agency assessed the maximum statutory fines, a total of $21,500 for four alleged serious violations, against a small Oklahoma grain company in connection with amputation injuries suffered by two teenage workers. Does this case demonstrate the need to increase the amounts OSHA can issue in penalties?