OSHA Addresses Restraining Mechanisms for Sharps Containers

In an April 18, 2008, Letter of Interpretation posted to OSHA's Web site Dec. 4, the agency addresses the placement of sharps containers in facilities and the requirement to ensure they are maintained in an upright position.

Specifically, the agency responded to this question: "In a laboratory where sharps containers are kept close to employees' workstations with lids and are positioned so that they are kept upright, is it necessary to have 'mechanisms' to restrain the containers as a precaution from spillage?"

Richard E. Fairfax, director of OSHA's Enforcement Program Directorate, pointed out that 29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(ii) requires that, during use, containers for contaminated sharps must be "[m]aintained upright throughout use" and that the use of mechanisms to restrain sharps is one way of preventing spillage during use. He added, however, that the agency's bloodborne pathogens standard does not specify the use of restraining mechanisms for all situations of sharps container use.

"For example, if a workplace assessment reveals that sharps containers can be maintained in an upright position during use with no danger of being knocked over or spilled, or that the containers must remain unrestrained to accommodate mobility needs, or employees or patients might be endangered by fixed sharps containers (e.g., in a mental health or correctional facility), the use of restraining mechanisms would not be mandatory," Fairfax wrote. "The placement of sharps containers, as well as the measures used to maintain them in an upright position during use, must be based on the site-specific hazard assessment of the area of intended use."

Fairfax noted that NIOSH's "Selecting, Evaluating, and Using Sharps Disposal Containers" document recommends important components of a site-specific hazard analysis in the selection of sharps containers, including

  • container transport or mobility needs;
  • clinician and procedural variability and movement; and
  • laboratory equipment variability and movement.

"If, after evaluating the work environment, an employer determines that restraining mechanisms are not required, but makes the decision to install them as an added measure to ensure the sharps containers are maintained upright, doing so should not, in itself, create an unsafe or unhealthful condition," Fairfax wrote.

Comments

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Follow Us

Upcoming Webinars

6/19: Building a Fall Protection Plan and a Safer Workplace

This webinar will help companies write a detailed, site-specific fall protection plan that addresses their fall protection goals.

7/10: Combustible Dust: From Sparks to Fires to Explosions Identifying Precursors to Catastrophic Events

This webinar will provide valuable information on how partnering with the nation’s fire service assists facility owners, managers, and OHS professionals in identifying combustible dust hazards, preventing incidents, and reducing liability.

7/18: The United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals, (GHS), will it revolutionize workplace safety?

We invite you to join us as we identify some of the pitfalls of GHS and some real solutions that can be implemented in your workplace today to simplify your chemical information and training program and enable your employees to work more safely with hazardous materials.

7/25: SPCC Regulations: What Do They Look Like Now?

This webinar will address the history and current status of EPA's Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule, which is intended to prevent the discharge of oil to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.

9/19: Shrinking Exposure Thresholds: Stay Ahead of the Game

The truth is that sensor technology is evolving rapidly and Dräger will show you how to trust this technology to stay ahead of the game.

Spotlight

For June 2013, OH&S puts the spotlight on: