Last Appeal Against Construction Ergonomics Standard Denied

A final effort to have the ANSI/ASSE A10.40-2007 American National Standard, Reduction of Musculoskeletal Problems in Construction withdrawn has been dismissed by the American National Standards Institute Appeals Board Panel. The appeal had been brought by the Construction Industry Employer Coalition, a group of five construction trade associations, which has been trying to block the standard since it was approved by the ANSI/ASSE A10 Accredited Standards Committee on Construction and Demolition Operations in 2006.

The board upheld its approval of the standard after an appeal hearing on March 14, 2008, and the coalition then appealed again, on May 5 -- the last appeal available under ANSI procedures.

The voluntary standard aims to prevent musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) through risk assessment and the hierarchy of controls, training, PPE, and assessment of workers' physical capabilities. For help in preventing MSDs in construction, ASSE recommends a NIOSH booklet that is available at www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2007-122/. ASSE's position statement on ergonomics is online at www.asse.org/professionalaffairs/govtaffairs/ergonomicsfinal0406.php.


Share this Page


Comments

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Follow Us

OH&S is on Twitter.

Join OH&S Magazine on SafetyCommunity!
Join us on SafetyCommunity!

Upcoming Webinars

2/29: GHS will happen…are you ready?
We invite you to attend this webinar to see how GHS is being used today in several workplaces to enhance worker comprehension and safety.

3/14: 10 Webinar Best Practices. Step-by-step guide to executing a winning webinar
By attending this webinar about webinars, you will learn the what, why and how’s of this exciting, collaborative marketing tool.

Spotlight

For February, OH&S puts the spotlight on:

Poll

OSHA Region 6 Administrator John Hermanson says the agency assessed the maximum statutory fines, a total of $21,500 for four alleged serious violations, against a small Oklahoma grain company in connection with amputation injuries suffered by two teenage workers. Does this case demonstrate the need to increase the amounts OSHA can issue in penalties?