Study: Women's Skulls Thicker, Men's Wider; Might Affect Protection Design

According to a new imaging study of 3,000 people using the latest in imaging analysis techniques, women's skulls are thicker than men's, and both shrink slowly in adulthood. The average skull thickness for men is 6.5 millimeters, and the average for women is 7.1 mm. The average front-to-back measurement is 176 mm for men and 171 mm for women, and the average width is 145 mm for men and 140 mm for women. These detailed results could help in the design of more effective devices for protecting the head in vehicle collisions and other accidents, the researchers say.

"Skull thickness differences between genders are confirmed in our study," says Jesse Ruan of the Ford Motor Company, who, along with colleagues at Tianjin University of Science and Technology, published their research in the International Journal of Vehicle Safety. "The next step will be to find out how these differences translate into head impact response of male and female, and then we can design the countermeasure for head protection."

Skull thickness, as one might expect, improves the outcome for anyone suffering a head injury, but studies have also demonstrated that skull shape can also have an effect. However, the detailed relationship between skull thickness and shape and how well a person tolerates a head injury have not been settled, with most studies simply extrapolating from smaller to larger skull and thickness to predict the likely effects of an impact. The current research, which involved a detailed statistical analysis of the various measurements for all 3,000 people scanned, shows that the distribution of skull size, shape, and thickness do not follow a so-called "normal" distribution pattern and so such extrapolations may be invalid. "Reliable biomechanical geometric data of the human skull can help us to better understand the problem of head injury during an impact," the researchers say, "and help in the design of better head protective devices."



Share this Page


Comments

Fri, Dec 30, 2011 Guest

While this study does have some merit, like many scientific articles it over-simplifies the subject matter. The most common form of head trauma is blunt force impact. An experiment....prepare yourself for a prison sentence. Then go punch a man in the head as hard as you can. When you're done dealing with that situation, go punch a woman in the head as hard as you can. On average the man will absorb the blow better (Why is this with his thinner skull?) The neck is the head's shock-absorber, the stronger one's neck muscles the better they can handle a blow to the head. Experiment 2...prepare to lose some teeth. Go punch an average joe in the head...then go punch a boxer in the head. The boxer will take the hit better. Why? Fitness, specifically stronger neck muscles. (The factors at work here don't apply only to punches, just using them as a common example of something which can cause head-trauma. Your neck muscles will still come into play when you are face-planted into a windshield) So while this is interesting from a study point of view, as stated before this drastically over-simplifies the subject of head trauma.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Follow Us

OH&S is on Twitter.

Join OH&S Magazine on SafetyCommunity!
Join us on SafetyCommunity!

Upcoming Webinars

2/29: GHS will happen…are you ready?
We invite you to attend this webinar to see how GHS is being used today in several workplaces to enhance worker comprehension and safety.

3/14: 10 Webinar Best Practices. Step-by-step guide to executing a winning webinar
By attending this webinar about webinars, you will learn the what, why and how’s of this exciting, collaborative marketing tool.

Spotlight

For February, OH&S puts the spotlight on:

Poll

OSHA Region 6 Administrator John Hermanson says the agency assessed the maximum statutory fines, a total of $21,500 for four alleged serious violations, against a small Oklahoma grain company in connection with amputation injuries suffered by two teenage workers. Does this case demonstrate the need to increase the amounts OSHA can issue in penalties?