The OH&S Wire

Blog archive

What I Hate About OSHA

Almost everywhere I go, people talk about how OSHA screws up their work, slows them down and makes life miserable. I rarely hear someone say, "Man, OSHA is really doing a great job." Here are seven of the most common complaints I hear when teaching safety classes.

1. They come onto my site and it's private property. I own this building and land, so I should be able to tell OSHA they can't come in. According to a 1973 Supreme Court ruling (Marshall v. Barlow's Inc.), you can do so, if you want. In that case, it was ruled that private property used as a business is subject to the same protection as any other private property. I wouldn't advise it, though. If the OSHA Field Safety Compliance Officer is not allowed access, he can then get a search warrant and have it served by U.S. marshals. That could ruin your day.

2. OSHA tells me I now have to pay for all my employees' PPE. What's that about? They have to buy their own tools, so they should pay for PPE, right? Not really. OSHA found that in many cases, employees purchased PPE that was ineffective or just incorrect. It's pretty sad when OSHA has to bring out a final rule telling employers they have to supply the PPE required for a job (11/15/2007). In 2008, 5,214 workers died on the job. Who was looking out for them?

3. Speaking of PPE, we never had that junk when I was in the field, and we did just fine. Did I just hear, "We've always done it that way?" Or maybe it was, "Real men don't need that crap." Think about this: Prior to 1970, there were about half as many workers in the United States as there are today, and there were 14,300 job-related deaths. Today, with a workforce more than twice as large, fewer than 5,000 workers are killed on the job in a year. Comparing relative rates (1970 vs 2008) there are about 82 percent fewer fatalities now than in 1970. That sounds pretty good, unless you consider that 5,214 workers were given capital punishment for the crime of going to work. Doesn't sound so good, does it? Maybe the good old days weren't so good.

4. OSHA writes citations that cost me money. How am I supposed to stay in business? Short answer: Maybe you shouldn't be in business if you can't protect your workers. Long answer: OSHA will reduce the fines for citations based on several factors:

  • Number of employees
  • No citations within five years
  • Good-faith efforts

Be aware that OSHA is moving forward with the Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP), which affects the size of the fine for 23 different regulations involving fall hazards and other hazards identified by OSHA. The SVEP will allow OSHA to cite each violation, instead of grouping them. It also allows OSHA to reduce the size of any fine reductions it would normally give. Lastly on this topic, OSHA is raising the dollar amount for its citations. Serious violations will be subject to fines up to $12,000, and willful citations can be as high as $250,000! Now, that dog has some real teeth!

5. How am I supposed to understand this gibberish OSHA calls regulations? It's true that OSHA's regulations are written in "broad, regulatory, non-prescriptive language," as one of my OSHA buddies says. I do believe that is the definition Webster's gives for the word "vague." That being said, there are several resources to help. OSHA will come to your site, perform an audit, and not cite you for its findings. You will have to correct those problems within a certain abatement period, but now you will know exactly what needs to be done. They also can set you up with a larger company that will mentor you. If you are the bookish type, there are dozens of books dealing with OSHA regulations, not to mention training that is offered by outside providers. The NFPA 70E standard is an excellent source of information if you're trying to decipher the OSHA regulations. The regulations are somewhat vague, but 70E provides guidance on how to meet the OSHA electrical regulations.

6. Following OSHA regulations slows me down. They certainly will. Performing a task in a safe manner will always take more time than going at it unsafely. You have to plan and prepare, assemble what is needed, and then follow your plan -- that all takes time. In the electrical trade we had a saying: "There are old electricians and there are fast electricians, but there are no old, fast electricians." I think that covers the need for speed.

7. I don't have the time to study all those regulations or even the 70E. I'm trying to run my business. Time, they say, is of the essence. Isn't it worth some of your valuable time to learn how to protect your employees? Isn't it worth some of your employees' time to learn how to protect themselves? Item number 5 also would apply to this complaint, as the solutions would be similar. It amazes me how workers in this country (not all, but the majority) feel it is someone else's responsibility to keep them safe. Unfortunately, our society has moved to one that refuses to acknowledge responsibility for mis-actions. Everyone, give a big hand to our legal system, which has managed to twist logic to where we no longer have to admit we screwed up.

Safety is serious business. Lives and quality of life depend on a safe work environment, as well as safe work practices. The employer is responsible to provide a workplace free from recognized hazards (recognized being recognized by the industry and OSHA). This would include developing an Electrical Safety Program, procedures, policies to protect workers, and providing PPE. Workers must implement those, however. I recently heard of the workers at one facility going to their union (and the union supported them) to prevent the implementation of a company's ESP. I don't know all of the details, but it certainly sounds like wrong-headed thinking.

Think about this: Being killed is one thing. It's over and done with. Being maimed or crippled is an entirely different level. Now, for the rest of your life, every day, you have to deal with the consequences of the accident. One keynote speaker at the 2007 IEEE/IAS/Electrical Safety Workshop was an ex-lineman who had been severely injured in an accident. He said, "No matter how much money you get from the insurance company or the lawsuit, it doesn't make your life better. You take what's left of your life, and you make the most of it." He lost both of his legs and an arm. I'll just take his word for it, thank you.

Posted by Jim White on Apr 21, 2011


Comments

Sun, Jul 10, 2011

Someone made a mistake. OSHA has only 1000 employees for the entire county and possesions.

Sun, Jul 10, 2011

Fall Protection is not included in PPE becaus it may be railings, nets, or harness. Thus it got it's own section.

Fri, Jul 8, 2011 Buck Lyn Texas

In regard to Editor's Comment as to PPE. A strict interpretation of the 1910 Rules includes in the Chapter on PPE... Hard Hats, eye and face, hand, foot, etc. In design of a program, I do not include Fall Protection as PPE as it is not in the PPE Chapter of the Standards. One has to have some logical organization, and as the Standards are the Law, that was my Organization. I did not create the system . . . merely had to try to Comply because of threat of the Government. And, there is some real doubt if OSHA followed proper Rule Making authority by including FRC in the Subchapter on PPE. This administration has set back all precedent by invoking what "feels good" to some Administrator, rather than follow the Law.

Thu, Jul 7, 2011

One of the biggest problems is that OSHA is the second smallest federal entity with fewer than 6,000 employees to cover the 50 states and all of our possessions, Puerto Rico, Guam, and others. That is the total number of employees, from CO's through file clerks, admin assistants, managers, equipment techs, the staff of the training institute, the works! When I attended the training institute in 1985 (osh compliance officer), it was THE SMALLEST FEDERAL AGENCY, but I believe that the Chemical Safety board is now. It was estimated at that time that, barring a complaint, an employer could expect to see a Compliance Officer once every 29 years. This is how the system works; Congress establishes an agency and pats themselves on the back. Then they keep the agency small so the impact is not too great. OF COURSE EVERY CONGRESSMAN AND SENATOR IS WILLING TO INTERCEDE ON BEHALF OF A BUSINESSMAN IN THEIR DISTRICT.

Wed, Jul 6, 2011 Airwolf

All in all, excellent piece! Ref #5...OSHA will not come to your site & perform an audit. However, Congress provides the majority of the funding for state consultation services for small businesses "<500 employees company wide" throughout the US and all of her territories. Some great comments were made. However, I agree it is sad to hear some of the same old idiotic responses. OSHA should not be a distraction. It is just a major piece of the bigger picture. Competition with other counties. So how much do you want to pay out of your pocket? Made in the USA cost more. Made elsewhere, usually costs less. Facts of life. PPE does prevent fatalities. Otherwise, I would not be here. Why not give time to fix the problem? You have had 40 years so far. How much more time do you need? Times up when OSHA shows up. Management needs to follow through and fire their employees if they can't get with the program. Once again, why does OSHA need to do the job of owners and their managers? Take responsibility for your company, your employees! BTY... I have been a safety professional since 1973.

Wed, Jul 6, 2011

in regard to the firehouse inspection that was not federal osha as they have no jurisdiction over government employees. That gentleman would have been from the New Jeraey Department of Labor. They have an approved state plan which collected a total of $200.00 last year from ALL INSPECTIONS. according to National Safety News, a publication of the national Safety Council. Gee with stringent enforcement like that why do we need the feds.

Tue, Jul 5, 2011

We run a NJ Volunteer/Career firehouse. I just went though an OSHA inspection at my Firehouse, first the inspector showed up unexpectedly and was told the Commissioners are in charge of the firehouse. He stated to the career firefighters on duty he only wanted to talk with the Union Rep. for the paid men. When the career rep. asked if they should call a Commissioner he said the Union Rep. could handle the inspection. They then walked the firehouse inspecting everything from electrical outlets, to fire gear. The OSHA inspector found approximately 15 minor violations. Everything from book shelf’s not being secured to a man’s fire gloves having a tear. I may add it was the Career Union Rep’s gloves with the tear that he had control over since he distributes new gear. The OSHA inspector then said he would write everything up and return after his boss signed off on the NOV’s. OSHA called a few days later to set a date for the conference with a Commissioner and the Union Rep. The problem I have is the OSHA inspector should have requested a Commissioner be present during his inspection, and why does he only want to talk with the Union Rep., is this protocol?

Tue, Jul 5, 2011 Bill Kincaid

OSHA's fines may have gone up but they are still only inspecting a tiny fraction of businesses. They are tasked with "spot check" enforcement. There are many establishments where OSHA has never been seen but yet there is a big focus on compliance. Therefore the fines are purely symbolic to many companies. My concern is the push for OSHA compliance distracts from the real job of getting people to believe working safely is a routine expectation.

Fri, Jun 24, 2011 Jim White Dallas, TX

I haven't responded to comments before now because my life is a wreck. I'm over-worked and between homes, so my head is spinning. I expect it to get to normal sometime soon. OSHA is a necessary evil. Evil, because it takes money and resources away from businesses that they could use to improve their businesses. It also takes tax dollar support, even though it is primarily self-funded. It's necessary because there will always be people who don't do what they should do - much the same as the reason we need cops. I hear what the one commenter said about the employee portion of the equation. OSHA follows the Golden Rule - He Who Has The Gold Makes The Rules. The employer can modify employee actions (probably not attitude) by making changes in their paychecks. OSHA does recognize that there are employees who won't get with the program, but the employer has to show they have given that employee all the tools and knowledge they need, but they still refused to comply. I appreciate all the comments back and forth. I just hope everyone goes home in the same condition they arrived at work today. Jim

Wed, Jun 15, 2011

WOW! One legitamite complaint! Competition with other countries is a serious problem. However, that is the way congress wants it. Been 30 years working toward that goal. Eventually USA will not produce anything but will be a FINANCIAL CENTER.

Wed, Jun 15, 2011

Remember, we're the government and we're here to help you. (trouble)

Mon, Jun 13, 2011 Minnesota

Those folks who don't think government should have a role protecting workers don't seem to have a problem with the huge benefit they get from government-sponsored Workers Comp's sole-remedy doctrine. If they had to go to court and face a jury and personal injury lawyer whenever they injured - or killed - a worker, running a safe workplace would quickly look very cheap.

Mon, Jun 13, 2011

I agree that OSHA's standards are the right thing to do, and my business upholds them. But how is my business supposed to compete with Asian businesses that pay no trade tariffs, pay their workers $10 a week, aren't required to provide PPE, and aren't subject to OSHA fines?

Sat, Jun 11, 2011 Editor

PPE can and does prevent fatalities, but it not the sole solution, as we all know. Falls from height and arc flash events are obvious examples where people wearing PPE have survived because of it.

Sat, Jun 11, 2011 Buck Lyn Anywhere

As to # 2, I doubt seriously that any piece of PPE prevented a fatality . Part of the problem in this business.... thanks to the good old USA, PPE vendors have distracted the issue.

Thu, Jun 9, 2011 Robin K Texas

For those of you who say, "Why not give time to correct the hazard...." Guess what? They already do - ALL states have OSHA consultation programs. Funny how people don't question the rights of a policeman to stop a crime - OSHA is a law enforcement agency. If you don't have time, as a business owner, to ensure the safety of your workers, you can get free help, hire full or part time safety and health professionals for help. I've been an IH for 15 years. The excuses have not changed, on either side. We all need to step up and be responsible for ourselves and others.

Thu, Jun 9, 2011

Management 101- Management is responsible for what occurs in the workplace. This is the rationale for OSHA! The employers plans the work, directs the work and measures the quality of the work. OSHA emforcement is a quality issue. If you can enforce production standards you can enforce safety standards. If you have trained the employee, provided the proper safety equipment and have adopted a graduated disciplinary system (which, by the way, is good management) then you have documented the reasons for discharge. And believe me, you will not have to discharge very meny employees before the message gets out. One big problem is that too many persons who are called managers think of themseklves as "BOSSES"!

Mon, Jun 6, 2011 Terry Minnesota

Nice article. As a trainer, consultant, and safety manger of over 25 years, I would have to agree with your basic point here - Yes, OSHA and safety regulation have been a good thing (when not mis-used by the government agencies). I would also agree that there are still a lot of "bad actor" employers out there, and if they don't or won't change their evil ways, they should go. I see this as the major job of OSHA right now, but they seem to be intent on focusing on issuing fines to everyone, regardless if they are trying to do the right thing. The part that you only slightly touched on that needs a lot more emphasis is the role of the employee. When training is offered and proper gear is issued, yet they decide to ignore your procedure because they think it's going to slow them down or hinder their operations, what does OSHA say then? They say it's still the employers fault. I think that is wrong. I have always thought that safety is a "team sport", but I guess that OSHA / MSHA is only interested in holding the people with the "deep pockets" accountable. About the only thing that an employer can do to a "non-compliant" employee is to terminate them, and even that is getting more & more difficult to do because the government "has rules".

Mon, Jun 6, 2011 Wade Smith USA

Why is it when there is a traumatic weather event we look to FEMA for help and assistance? Why is it when there is an oil spill we look to EPA and the Coast Guard for help and assistance? It costs millions of dollars to put lives, homes, and businesses back together after a major event. But if a person dies on the job because someone didn't make sure he was tied off then we don't want to look to OSHA for assistance. OSHA is a pain and all they do is cost us and the tax payer money. How much is a human life worth to you Mr. or Ms. Businessperson? OSHA and the rest of us professional safety people are here to help, if you will just ask, listen, and adhere to the advice. Don't tell me about the good old days. I was there, they weren't all that great. Don't tell me it costs too much. Every penny you pay for safety is trivial compared to human life. Until you have had to look into the eyes of a mother, a father, a widow and her children because your employee, their son, their daughter, their husband and father, isn't going home any more because it cost too much to put up a barricade or purchase the correct PPE I don't want to hear your crying and whining about OSHA. Yes you will be fined by OSHA for negligence but wait until the famiy's attorneys get through with you. You thought a $20,000 OSHA fine was high, wait until you are paying out millions of dollars for hospital bills, lost wages, pain and suffering. The cost of a hardhat is $10.00, a full-body harness is $75.00, a confined space air monitoring system is $500.00, but the price of one life or being maimed is priceless.

Mon, Jun 6, 2011

It seems to me that you have missed some of the problems many have with OSHA. (1) Instead of fining a business the first time they come in, I think they should give them time to correct the issues without fines. (2) They never seem to want to hold the person, (employee) responsible for doing the right thing. I have taught many safety classes over the past 30 years, and you can give the employee all the information needed. But yoiu can't make them comply.

Tue, May 31, 2011 K. Moore Florida

The blog is a reminder of the precious life and the lives of others around us that can be taken by refusing to use safety at the jobsite, and in general, and the guidelines and standards that OSHA and other professional organizations provide to workers and employers for free and at minimal cost. Recently, I was confronted by someone mirroring the sentiments that this blog addresses. This person feels safety is nonsense and continues to undermine protocol by accessing a dangerously high voltage area to cut-off electrical power while not trained nor wearing proper PPE. When confronted, this person merely raised his hand and brow and ignores the caution! I did suggest to this person, “one day you won’t have the luxury of returning home from work or waking up the next day healthy, then you may want to recount your attitude towards safety!" This blog provides pause to all whom dismiss safety so quickly!

Tue, Apr 26, 2011

Seems incredible that 40 YEARS IN, WE STILL HEAR THE SAME OLD, SAME OLD. I suppose there are some business owners who do not join their trade organizations and therefore don't know that OSHA can get a warrant. An employer who refuses to provide PPE, or provides the wrong type, is an employer who is paying BIG workers comp premiums. And yeah, we still have guys who are "iron men" proud of the unsafe conditions they have faced. AND A BIG HAND FOR POINTING OUT THAT NOT EVERYONE SHOULD BE RUNNING A BUSINESS, PARTICULARLY THOSE WHO ARE OBLIVIOUS TO THE HAZARDS OF THE WORK THEY HIRE WORKERS FOR. There are tons of seminars, webinars, consultants, books, courses etc. to help you understand the regulations. It is easier if you keep the intent of the regulation in mind. While it is true that following a certain procedure, ANY PROCEDURE can slow you down when it is first introduced. However, when it becomes routine, the delay is significantly less. 90 years ago, when the concept of "time and motion studies" was first introduced, industrial engineers made their calculations based on the idea that the operator was just a cog in the mchine and had no limits ,such as strength, stamina, health, etc. In general, I have found that those who say they have no time for safety are poor managers who often cannot see the forest for the trees. In today's world, our actions tend to create ripples which affect all of us. Higher WC rate equals higher costs. Disabilities lead to higher medical costs. FOR EVERYONE! We have OSHA because we cannot afford the costs associated with accidents.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Follow Us

OH&S is on Twitter.

Join OH&S Magazine on SafetyCommunity!
Join us on SafetyCommunity!

Upcoming Webinars

2/29: GHS will happen…are you ready?
We invite you to attend this webinar to see how GHS is being used today in several workplaces to enhance worker comprehension and safety.

3/14: 10 Webinar Best Practices. Step-by-step guide to executing a winning webinar
By attending this webinar about webinars, you will learn the what, why and how’s of this exciting, collaborative marketing tool.

3/15: Does your safety culture encompass the management of all operations and process risks? How would you know?
You will learn how to utilize best practices that can be used to help translate a strong workplace safety culture into a strong operational risk management culture and much more.

Spotlight

For February, OH&S puts the spotlight on:

Poll

The Pentagon spends $1.4 billion annually to treat health problems related to obesity, the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs says. What is your company doing to encourage employees to be healthier?