Accident Victims Are More than Statistics
Minimizing the stress imposed during an emergency incident shouldn't be overlooked in your safety and response planning and training.
"WHEN you have bacon and eggs for breakfast, the chicken is involved, but the pig is committed!" I don't remember where I first heard that saying, but it humorously portrays the difference between participating in an event and being an intimate part of the action. In that regard, it also applies to spill and splash accidents at industrial sites.
Plant management and safety personnel strive to minimize the occurrence of accidents, but when they do occur we want to provide the best immediate and continuing response possible. We have a professional stake in doing the right thing, but the victim has an overwhelmingly personal stake in the outcome. Sometimes our zeal to handle the more mechanical aspects of emergency response overshadows the victim's needs and psychological state-of-mind in the moments following an accident. The people around an accident victim are involved in helping with emergency response, but the victim is really involved!
Between the trauma itself, shock, and often a sense of embarrassment that the accident even happened, a victim's state of mind during emergency response procedures usually ranges from anxious to downright terrified. Minimizing the stress imposed on a victim during an emergency incident shouldn't be overlooked in safety and response planning and training.
Planning
Proper planning to address the personal needs of accident victims begins with recognition of those needs, which are mostly common sense. If you understand the effects of trauma--the possibility of pain, nervous agitation, and accompanying shock, along with possible embarrassment--proper planning becomes a function of answering those needs and alleviating concerns to the degree possible.
Selection of the proper equipment and reasonable placement will go a long way toward easing victim concerns. Establishing the proper procedures to provide immediate first aid assistance, while also reassuring and comforting the victim, is equally critical. And, as with all areas of safety and emergency response, training on the risks and dangers present, as well as the emergency response equipment available--including locations and use instructions--is an obvious necessity. Let's consider each area.
Equipment
The need for quality emergency showers and eyewashes is obvious. Emergency equipment that doesn't work, hasn't been properly maintained, or doesn't provide the required capabilities will exacerbate the victim's anxiety. . . .with cause, perhaps.
High-quality emergency equipment in the proper numbers and locations is a good starting point. This is not a place to look to save money. Features such as high-visibility signage, easy-to-operate actuation, flow controls to assure smooth operation, and diffused spray and shower heads are good investments.
Note the aggressiveness of the flow versus the more diffused design. Imagine an injured employee stepping up to the eyewash with the aggressive flow and forcing his or her face down into it . . . it's not incredibly inviting or comforting. The products you choose can have an impact on the degree of anxiety experienced by accident victims.
Likewise, imagine an injured employee needing to disrobe under an emergency shower flow and stand there for the required 15-minute use cycle. While it has to be done and few would hesitate, consider the state of mind of that employee a few minutes into the cycle. Remember, the victim is probably embarrassed that the accident occurred anyway. Now, add the embarrassment of an exposed shower. A number of products on the market address the privacy needs of victims using the emergency equipment.
The ultimate visibility and privacy is afforded by enclosed products. These emergency shower and eyewash booths offer superior visibility to accident victims en route to first response equipment, as well as privacy during use. In larger sizes, they can provide space inside for safety personnel to assist the victim during use.
Beyond providing operable and tested emergency equipment with features that offer as much comfort and privacy as possible, it is imperative that your emergency response program encourage full-cycle use. ANSI Z358.1-2004 stipulates that emergency showers and eyewashes should be used for a full 15-minute drench or irrigation cycle in all instances. This is to assure that all hazardous materials have been adequately flushed from the body, mitigating potential further injury.
In many geographic areas, municipally supplied water can become cold enough to make a 15-minute use cycle a torture test, let alone a comforting experience. Likewise, there are geographic areas and hot ambient temperature industrial processes that can heat municipal water to dangerously warm levels, again possibly resulting in a shortened use cycle. It is imperative that emergency response assets reconcile these situations with either tempering or reverse tempering to ensure the water used is within a safe and comfortable range. Per the ANSI Z358.1 standard, the range should be between 60° F and up to below 100° F for both emergency showers and eyewashes.
This article originally appeared in the May 2005 issue of Occupational Health & Safety.